Response to Keating and Rossell.
Response to Keating and Rossell.
复制标题
对基廷和罗塞尔的回应。
DOI：
10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13060813r
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mittal,VijayA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Frank,GuidoK;Shott,MeganE;Hagman,JenniferO;Mittal,VijayA
最后，鉴于神经性贪食症的特征是无法控制的进食，而持续的食物回避是神经性厌食症的特征，该模型是如何提出的(在进食障碍中，更大的直回体积与更强的对食物刺激…的感觉体验有关神经性厌食症和神经性暴食症之间的差异是什么原因？然而，也许最重要的是，所描述的进食障碍中更大的直回体积与对食物刺激的更强感觉体验相关的模式是健康对照受试者的模式；因此，作者应该谨慎对待将健康对照关系病理性地处理。
Finally, given that bulimia nervosa is characterized by uncontrollable bouts of eating, whereas sustained food avoidance is characteristic in anorexia nervosa, how does the model proposed (“greater gyrus rectus volume in eating disorders is associated with stronger sensory experience of food stimuli… which could trigger cognitively driven food avoidance”) account for differences between anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa? Perhaps most important, however, is that the described pattern of greater gyrus rectus volume in eating disorders being associated with stronger sensory experiences of food stimuli is the pattern for healthy comparison subjects; hence, the authors should be cautious as to pathologizing the healthy control relationship.