Integrating timing and conditioning approaches to study behavior.
Integrating timing and conditioning approaches to study behavior.
复制标题
整合时间和调节方法来研究行为。
DOI：
10.1037/xan0000037
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Church,RussellM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kalafut,KathrynL;Freestone,DavidM;MacInnis,MikaLM;Church,RussellM
斯金纳和巴甫洛夫有创新的方法来衡量他们的主题的反应时间，以及他们的反应速度。从那时起，动物行为研究的不同子领域优先考虑反应的速度或时间，在数据和理论上产生了分歧。时间和条件场都被证明是富有成效的，产生了大量的经验数据，并开发了复杂的模型。尽管他们各自取得了成功，但仍然缺乏对简单行为的统一看法。这可能至少部分是由于对数据收集和分析技术的重视程度不同造成的。结果是，这些子字段生成的模型很好地拟合了它们的数据，但无法转换到另一个域。这是令人吃惊的事实，这两个子领域使用几乎相同的实验程序。为了突出子领域内的相似性，并提供支持这种整合的经验数据，对18只Sprague-Dawley大鼠进行了跟踪，延迟和向后条件反射程序的训练。使用这些经验数据，我们讨论了如何传统的汇总措施，这些子领域可以限制，并建议的方法，可能有助于这些子领域的整合，朝着共同的目标。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020阿帕，保留所有权利）
Skinner and Pavlov had innovative ways to measure both the times of their subject’s responses, as well as the rate of their responses. Since then, different subfields within the study of animal behavior have prioritized either the rate or timing of responses, creating a divide in data and theory. Both timing and conditioning fields have proven fruitful, producing large bodies of empirical data and developing sophisticated models. Despite their individual successes, a unified view of simple behavior is still lacking. This may be caused, at least in part, by the differential emphasis on data collection and analysis techniques. The result is that these subfields produce models that fit their data well, but fail to translate to the other domain. This is startling given the fact that both subfields use nearly identical experimental procedures. To highlight similarities within the subfields, and provide empirical data in support of this integration, 18 Sprague–Dawley rats were trained on trace, delay, and backward conditioning procedures. Using these empirical data we discuss how traditional summary measures used by these subfields can be limiting, and suggest methods that may aid in the integration of these subfields toward common goals.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)