The Timing of Language Change
The Timing of Language Change
复制标题
语言改变的时机
DOI:
10.1002/9781118257227.ch23
复制
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Mieko Ogura
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Mieko Ogura
The most explicit hypothesis on how sound change comes about was proposed by the Neogrammarians working in Germany in the mid-1870s. The Neogrammarian hypothesis has essentially two parts: lexical regularity and phonetic gradualness. We will not repeat the various arguments that have been offered recently to show the difficulties of the Neogrammarian hypothesis–see Ogura (1987), and also Chapter 22 in this Handbook. In view of the unsatisfactory state of the mechanism that the Neogrammarians advocated, other processes for implementing sound change have been proposed. Empirical investigations over the past four decades on a variety of languages, using large amounts of data, have shown that there must be a process which is implemented in a manner that is lexically gradual, diffusing across the lexicon. This is an inevitable consequence of admitting phonetic abruptness; in his seminal article Wang (1969) called this process ‘lexical diffusion.’The chronological profile of lexical diffusion may be represented by the S-curve slope. When the change first enters the language, the number of words it affects may be small. The change gradually diffuses, going slowly at first. Then, as it spreads, it accelerates, picking up speed in mid-stream. In the most active period, the change moves quickly through a large number of lexical items. It then gradually slows down again, and tapers off at the end (Chen 1972). The diffusion process is comparable to epidemics of infectious diseases, and the standard model of an epidemic produces an S-curve.