Construction of an instrument to measure student information and communication technology skills, experience and attitudes to e-learning

Construction of an instrument to measure student information and communication technology skills, experience and attitudes to e-learning
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.010
复制
发表时间:
2010-11
期刊:
Comput. Hum. Behav.
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Wilkinson;Julia Roberts;A. While
A. Wilkinson;Julia Roberts;A. While
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Wilkinson;Julia Roberts;A. While

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在过去的20年里,自我报告措施的医疗保健学生的信息和通信技术技能已经开发了有限的验证。此外,学生的电子学习经验的措施出现,但没有重复使用不同的人群。一个心理测量的方法,五个阶段被用来开发和测试一个新的自我报告的技能和经验,信息和通信技术和态度的计算机教育措施。第1阶段:文献综述和关键项目识别。第2阶段:与专家小组(n=16)和学生(n=3)一起开发和完善项目,以建立表面和内容效度。第三阶段:与毕业预注册护理专业学生(n=60)进行草案仪器的试点测试,以评估管理程序和仪器的可接受性。第4阶段:重新测试与毕业预注册护理学生(n=70)的样本进行了测试的稳定性和内部一致性。第5阶段:注册前护理专业学生(n=458)的主要研究,进一步测试内部一致性。该工具被证明具有中等的重测稳定性和分量表具有可接受的内部一致性。当用于一个更大的,更多样化的人口的心理特性更多变。需要进一步努力完善这一文书,具体提及可能的文化和语言反应模式以及技术进步。
Over the past 20years self-report measures of healthcare students’ information and communication technology skills have been developed with limited validation. Furthermore, measures of student experience of e-learning emerged but were not repeatedly used with diverse populations. A psychometric approach with five phases was used to develop and test a new self-report measure of skills and experience with information and communication technology and attitudes to computers in education. Phase 1: Literature review and identification of key items. Phase 2: Development and refinement of items with expert panel (n=16) and students (n=3) to establish face and content validity. Phase 3: Pilot testing of draft instrument with graduate pre-registration nursing students (n=60) to assess administration procedures and acceptability of the instrument. Phase 4: Test–retest with further sample of graduate pre-registration nursing students (n=70) tested stability and internal consistency. Phase 5: Main study with pre-registration nursing students (n=458), further testing of internal consistency. The instrument proved to have moderate test–retest stability and the sub-scales had acceptable internal consistency. When used with a larger, more diverse population the psychometric properties were more variable. Further work is needed to refine the instrument with specific reference to possible cultural and linguistic response patterns and technological advances.