Improved Merlin–Arthur Protocols for Central Problems in Fine-Grained Complexity
Improved Merlin–Arthur Protocols for Central Problems in Fine-Grained Complexity
复制标题
改进的 Merlin–Arthur 协议解决细粒度复杂性的核心问题
DOI:
10.1007/s00453-023-01102-6
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
影响因子:
1.1
通讯作者:
Williams, Ryan
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Akmal, Shyan;Chen, Lijie;Jin, Ce;Raj, Malvika;Williams, Ryan
In a Merlin–Arthur proof system, the proof verifier (Arthur) accepts valid proofs (from Merlin) with probability 1, and rejects invalid proofs with probability arbitrarily close to 1. The running time of such a system is defined to be the length of Merlin’s proof plus the running time of Arthur. We provide new Merlin–Arthur proof systems for some key problems in fine-grained complexity. In several cases our proof systems have optimal running time. Our main results include:Certifying that a list ofnintegers has no 3-SUM solution can be done in Merlin–Arthur time. Previously, Carmosino et al. [ITCS 2016] showed that the problem has a nondeterministic algorithm running intime (that is, there is a proof system with proofs of lengthand a deterministic verifier running intime).Counting the number ofk-cliques with total edge weight equal to zero in ann-node graph can be done in Merlin–Arthur time(where). For oddk, this bound can be further improved for sparse graphs: for example, counting the number of zero-weight triangles in anm-edge graph can be done in Merlin–Arthur time. Previous Merlin–Arthur protocols by Williams [CCC’16] and Björklund and Kaski [PODC’16] could only countk-cliques in unweighted graphs, and had worse running times for smallk.Computing the All-Pairs Shortest Distances matrix for ann-node graph can be done in Merlin–Arthur time. Note this is optimal, as the matrix can havenonzero entries in general. Previously, Carmosino et al. [ITCS 2016] showed that this problem has annondeterministic time algorithm.Certifying that ann-variablek-CNF is unsatisfiable can be done in Merlin–Arthur time. We also observe an algebrization barrier for the previous-time Merlin–Arthur protocol of R. Williams [CCC’16] forSAT: in particular, his protocol algebrizes, and we observe there is no algebrizing protocol fork-UNSAT running intime. Therefore we have to exploit non-algebrizing properties to obtain our new protocol.Certifying a Quantified Boolean Formula is true can be done in Merlin–Arthur time. Previously, the only nontrivial result known along these lines was an Arthur–Merlin–Arthur protocol (where Merlin’s proof depends on some of Arthur’s coins) running intime.Due to the centrality of these problems in fine-grained complexity, our results have consequences for many other problems of interest. For example, our work implies that certifying there is no Subset Sum solution tonintegers can be done in Merlin–Arthur time, improving on the previous best protocol by Nederlof [IPL 2017] which tooktime.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.4230/lipics.itcs.2018.18
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.
影响因子:
--
作者:
Oded Goldreich;G. Rothblum
通讯作者:
Oded Goldreich;G. Rothblum
影响因子:
1.4
作者:
Göös, Mika;Pitassi, Toniann;Watson, Thomas
通讯作者:
Watson, Thomas
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.
影响因子:
--
作者:
Omer Reingold;G. Rothblum;Ron D. Rothblum
通讯作者:
Ron D. Rothblum
DOI:
10.1016/j.ipl.2016.09.002
发表时间:
2016-02
期刊:
Inf. Process. Lett.
影响因子:
--
作者:
Jesper Nederlof
通讯作者:
Jesper Nederlof
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
IEEE Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
影响因子:
--
作者:
V. V. Williams;Yinzhan Xu
通讯作者:
Yinzhan Xu