A Lower-Brainstem Structure Coordinates Acquisition of Negative Experience
A Lower-Brainstem Structure Coordinates Acquisition of Negative Experience
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/s12264-020-00504-8
复制
发表时间:
2020-04
影响因子:
5.6
通讯作者:
Lei Li
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lei Li
To survive, animals must process aversive or stressful events quickly, and evaluate and store the related information. Accumulating neural circuity studies have identified key brain nuclei, such as the amygdala, lateral habenula (LHb), periaqueductal grey (PAG), ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus, hippocampus, among others, in the processing of negative experiences [1, 2]. Yet more work is needed to determine how these brain structures coordinate with each other in coping with such experiences. A recent study published in Science entitled ‘‘Median raphe controls acquisition of negative experience in the mouse’’from Dr. Nyiri’s group at the Hungarian Academy of Sciences sheds new light on this complex and important question [3]. Using cell-type-specific neuronal tracing, block-face scanning immunoelectron microscopy, in vivo and in vitro electrophysiology, and optogenetic and chemogenetic manipulations together with behavioral tasks, they revealed that the median raphe region (MRR, also named median raphe nucleus, MnR), especially the vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (vGluT2)-positive neurons in the MRR may serve as a key hub for the coordination of negative experience processing. While the serotoninergic neurons in the MRR have been investigated, Szonyi et al. studied a previously neglected neuron type–vGluT2-neurons. These constitute at least20% of all MRR neurons, and are distributed both in the median and the paramedian parts of the region. Using multichannel recording and optogenetic tagging, they showed that MRR vGluT2-neurons respond selectively to an aversive stimulus (air puffs) and to a much lesser extent to mildly aversive light-emitting diode flashes, while they do not respond to the rewarding stimulus of water drops. Three groups of functional experiments were carried out to decipher the roles of MRR vGluT2-neurons in negative experience. First, acute in vivo optogenetic somatic activation of these neurons caused significant real-time place aversion and conditioned place aversion, and a decrease in nose-pokes for food pallet rewards in hungry mice after pairing. Second, in vivo chemogenetic activation of the soma of the neurons led to highly aggressive behavior in a social interaction test and the resident-intruder test. Moreover, chronic chemogenetic activation of somata for 3 weeks induced anhedonia in the sucrose preference test. Third, the optogenetic activation of the MRR vGluT2-neurons triggered movement of the mice as well as hippocampal theta oscillations. In a loss-of-function study using a delay-cued fear conditioning paradigm, optogenetic inhibition of these neurons during the presentation of adverse stimuli decreased contextual freezing behavior and generalized conditioned fear, showing their essential role in storing the memory of a negative experience. Szonyi et al. reached the conclusion that ‘‘MRR controls acquisition of negative experience in the mouse’’based not only on the above functional data but also their solid and detailed tracing of the inputs and outputs of MRR vGluT2-neurons. It is worth pointing out that the use of block-face scanning immunoelectron microscopy to demonstrate the details of the synapses formed by MRR vGluT2-neurons with their downstream targets is a highlight. As shown in Figure 1 (green lines), MRR vGluT2-neurons receive