Measuring Outcomes for Dysphagia: Validity and Reliability of the European Portuguese Eating Assessment Tool (P-EAT-10)

Measuring Outcomes for Dysphagia: Validity and Reliability of the European Portuguese Eating Assessment Tool (P-EAT-10)
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/s00455-015-9630-5
复制
发表时间:
2015-10-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Lopes, Ines Sousa
Lopes, Ines Sousa
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nogueira, Dalia Santos;Ferreira, Pedro Lopes;Lopes, Ines Sousa

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本研究的目的是评估欧洲葡萄牙语版的EAT-10(P-EAT-10)的效度和信度。本研究分三个阶段进行:(i)文化和语言适应;(ii)可行性和可靠性测试;(iii)有效性测试。最终样本由520名受试者组成。比较P-EAT-10指数的社会人口统计学和临床变量。还比较了吞咽困难组和非吞咽困难组以及3 Oz wst的结果。最后,P-EAT-10评分与EuroQol组葡萄牙EQ-5D指数相关。P-EAT-10量表获得的Cronbach α为0.952,即使删除任何项目,仍保持极佳。项目总数和组内相关系数非常好。非吞咽困难队列的P-EAT-10平均值为0.56,吞咽困难队列的P-EAT-10平均值为14.26,3 Oz wst组和P-EAT-10评分之间的平均值比较具有显著性。一个显着更高的感知生活质量也被发现之间的非吞咽困难的主题。P-EAT-10是一种有效和可靠的测量方法,可用于记录吞咽困难,这使得它在临床实践和研究中的筛查都很有用。
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and the reliability of the European Portuguese version of the EAT-10 (P-EAT-10). This research was conducted in three phases: (i) cultural and linguistic adaptation; (ii) feasibility and reliability test; and (iii) validity tests. The final sample was formed by a cohort of 520 subjects. The P-EAT-10 index was compared for socio-demographic and clinic variables. It was also compared for both dysphagic and non-dysphagic groups as well as for the results of the 3Oz wst. Lastly, the P-EAT-10 scores were correlated with the EuroQol Group Portuguese EQ-5D index. The Cronbach's alpha obtained for the P-EAT-10 scale was 0.952 and it remained excellent even if any item was deleted. The item-total and the intraclass correlation coefficients were very good. The P-EAT-10 mean of the non-dysphagic cohort was 0.56 and that of the dysphagic cohort was 14.26, the mean comparison between the 3Oz wst groups and the P-EAT-10 scores were significant. A significant higher perception of QoL was also found among the non-dysphagic subjects. P-EAT-10 is a valid and reliable measure that may be used to document dysphagia which makes it useful both for screening in clinical practice and in research.