Intersex and Human Rights: The Long View
Intersex and Human Rights: The Long View
复制标题
双性人和人权:长远观点
DOI:
10.1007/1-4220-4314-7_4
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Dreger
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Dreger
This is an essay about how an article I published in 1998 was wrong. I hope the reader will bear with me and see this is not an exercise in narcissism or selfflagellation. It is, rather, an attempt to explain why changing the treatment of intersex has turned out to be a much harder job than those of us in the early intersex reform movement imagined it would be.Probably because we had so few allied doctors back then, in 1998 those of us agitating for intersex treatment reform were naïve about the way medical practice works. 1 Today we know that the standard of care for intersex wasn’t the simple anomaly we thought it was. As a consequence, though we started out thinking that to improve the care of people with intersex conditions we would just need to move the care of intersex into line with the rest of medicine, we now know there are some basic problems generalized in the institution of medical practice that contribute to the poor treatment of families dealing with intersex. Fixing the treatment of intersex isn’t, therefore, like trying to get one surly elephant to line up in a parade of otherwise well-behaved elephants. It’s like trying to push a whole parade of stubborn elephants—and trying to do this with soap on your feet. I want to suggest, though, that this heavy lifting—or heavy pushing—is worth it. That yes, it is very hard to change intersex practice, because it’s very hard to change any entrenched practice that continues to run on the energy of its own inertia. But changing the practice of intersex is going to have (and indeed already has started to have) critically useful effects for many other realms of medical care—for example, the care of gay and lesbian patients, and of children born with various anomalies and disabilities.