Can Extant Vaping Prevention Message Experiments Tell Us Something About What Works? A Response to O'Keefe.
Can Extant Vaping Prevention Message Experiments Tell Us Something About What Works? A Response to O'Keefe.
复制标题
现有的电子烟预防信息实验能否告诉我们什么是有效的？
DOI：
10.1080/10410236.2023.2212195
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Ribisl,KurtM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Noar,SethM;Ma,Haijing;Kieu,Talia;Ribisl,KurtM
在他的评论中，O'Keefe提出了一些关于实验荟萃分析中效应大小的意义的有趣问题，重点是我们最近对vaping预防信息的荟萃分析。在这篇评论中，我们回应了奥基夫的评论，并提出了几点。首先，在荟萃分析中包括不同控制条件的实验并不罕见。其次，我们的荟萃分析中的一组研究相对同质，都是测试信息的实验，以阻止青少年和年轻人使用电子烟。第三，荟萃分析中每个研究的控制条件都适合每个给定的研究，我们的结果显示对大多数结果的同质效应。第四，我们的荟萃分析发现了有意义的效果，这些效果是及时的，对研究人员和从业人员都有用。随着这些文献的不断增长，关于电子烟预防信息的影响和这些影响的调节者的知识也将不断增加。
In his commentary, O’Keefe raises some interesting questions about the meaning of effect sizes in meta-analyses of experiments, focusing on our recent meta-analysis on vaping prevention messages. In this commentary, we respond to O’Keefe’s comments and make several points. First, it is not uncommon to include experiments with different control conditions in a meta-analysis. Second, the set of studies in our meta-analysis were relatively homogenous, all being experiments testing messages to discourage vaping among adolescents and young adults. Third, the control conditions in each of the studies in the meta-analysis were appropriate for each given study, and our results show homogenous effects on most outcomes. Fourth, our meta-analysis finds meaningful effects that are timely and will be useful to researchers and practitioners alike. As this literature continues to grow, so too will knowledge about the effects of vaping prevention messages and moderators of those effects.