Problems in the concept of repression and proposals for their resolution.

Problems in the concept of repression and proposals for their resolution.
复制标题

镇压概念中的问题及其解决建议。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1996
期刊:
The International journal of psycho-analysis
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
R. M. Henry
R. M. Henry
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Maze;R. M. Henry

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文的作者接受压抑现象的现实,并认为它本身可以解释许多种精神病理学。然而,弗洛伊德对压抑机制的描述中的假设,即自我不断地防止被压抑的冲动成为意识,产生了一个逻辑问题。这就要求自我对被压抑的事物保持觉知。一个心理行为只有通过成为第二个心理行为的对象而成为有意识的,而不是通过拥有内在意识。必须设置某种障碍来阻止这第二种心理行为。弗洛伊德的原始压抑概念与克莱因的分裂和投射概念进行了比较,后者似乎避免了他的一些困难。有人提出,作为焦虑最初爆发的结果,在本能满足的某些图像的神经记录与可以记录这些图像的发生的其他神经组织之间建立了神经阻滞。因此,后者仍然是未知的,虽然仍然影响行为。神经学研究结果表明,这种机制是可能的。
The authors of this paper accept the reality of the phenomenon of repression and consider that it alone explains many kinds of psychopathology. Nevertheless, the assumption in Freud's sketch of the mechanism of repression that the ego continually guards against the repressed impulse becoming conscious creates a logical problem. That would require that the ego remain aware of the repressed. A mental act becomes conscious only by being made the object of a second mental act, not through possessing intrinsic consciousness. Some barrier must be set up to prevent this second mental act. Freud's concept of primal repression is compared with Kleinian concepts of splitting and projection, which seem to avoid some of his difficulties. It is proposed that as a result of initial outburst of anxiety, neurological blockages are set up between the neural registrations of certain images of instinctual gratification and those other neural organisations that could register the occurrence of those images. The latter thus remain unknown, though still affecting behaviour. Neurological findings suggest that some such mechanism is possible.