On the depoliticisation of intersectionality talk: conceptualising multiple oppressions in critical sexuality studies
On the depoliticisation of intersectionality talk: conceptualising multiple oppressions in critical sexuality studies
复制标题
关于交叉性谈话的非政治化：概念化批判性研究中的多重压迫
DOI：
10.1057/9780230304093_4
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
C. Klesse
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Umut Erel;Jin Haritaworn;E. Rodríguez;C. Klesse
酷儿理论作为一种激进的认识论，揭示了无处不在的权力形式，不仅围绕着性，也围绕着“种族”和变性人。有色酷儿理论家和一些跨性别理论家仍然对这些宏大的主张持怀疑态度，并指出在酷儿理论的主流中，对种族主义和跨性别恐惧症的沉默是臭名昭著的（charles）， 1993；科恩,2001;Haritaworn, 2007)。他们的批评呼应了一个更古老的传统，即将多重压迫关系理论化，有色人种女同性恋者，如奥德丽·洛德（1984年）、格洛丽亚·安扎尔杜瓦（1987年）、格洛丽亚·t·赫尔、帕特里夏·贝尔·斯科特和芭芭拉·史密斯（1982年、1983年），尤其提倡这种关系。虽然20世纪80年代的反种族主义女权主义产生了自己的沉默，特别是在跨性别和持不同意见的性行为方面，但我们在这里认为，她们对位置性的呼吁对于发展酷儿理论和研究实践至关重要，这些理论和研究实践解决了围绕种族的沉默。本章试图找到一种语言来表达我们对英国和德国有色人种变性人、有色人种酷儿、有色人种妇女和移民妇女的知识生产和政治活动被压制的不满；同时，它也是关于探索“交叉性”概念的可能性和局限性。在近二十年的批评性辩论中，围绕性别、“种族”和阶级的多重压迫是如何交织在一起的，“交叉性”作为一个概念出现了，它承诺了各种权力关系的全面理论化。
Queer theory offers itself as radical epistemology to uncover pervasive forms of power, not only around sexuality but also around ‘race’ and transgender. Queer of colour theorists and some trans theorists have remained sceptical about these grand claims, and pointed out the notorious silence about racism and transphobia in the mainstream of queer theorising ((charles), 1993; Cohen, 2001; Haritaworn, 2007). Their critique echoes an older tradition of theorising multiple relations of oppression that has been particularly advocated by lesbians of colour like Audre Lorde (1984), Gloria Anzaldua (1987) and Gloria T. Hull, Patricia Bell Scott and Barbara Smith (1982, 1983). While the anti-racist feminisms of the 1980s have produced their own silences, especially around transgender and dissident sexualities, we will here argue that their call to positionality is vital in developing a queer theory and research practice that addresses the silences around raciality. This chapter is an attempt to find a language for our dissatisfaction with the silencing of the knowledge productions and political activisms of trans people of colour, queers of colour, women of colour and migrant women in the UK and Germany; at the same time it is about exploring the possibilities and limits of the concept of ‘intersectionality’. In nearly two decades of a critical debate about how multiple oppressions around gender, ‘race’ and class interlock, ‘intersectionality’ emerged as a concept which promises a comprehensive theorising of various power relations.
转变立场：对酷儿/跨性别色彩方法论的实证反思
影响因子：
1.6
作者：
Haritaworn J
通讯作者：
Haritaworn J