Advancing Diagnostic Equity Through Clinician Engagement, Community Partnerships, and Connected Care.
Advancing Diagnostic Equity Through Clinician Engagement, Community Partnerships, and Connected Care.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1007/s11606-022-07966-8
复制
发表时间:
2023-04
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Singh, Hardeep
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Giardina, Traber D.;Woodard, LeChauncy D.;Singh, Hardeep
USA, equity issues specifically related to the diagnostic process warrant additional exploration. For example, Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients experience significantly higher rates of infection, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19, yet are less likely to be tested for coronavirus. 1 Similar disparities have been documented with cardiac testing and procedures, mental health diagnoses, appendicitis diagnosis, and receipt of diagnostic imaging in the ED. 2 Diagnosis-related inequity is particularly challenging to address especially given that diagnostic errors have been inadequately targeted by systemsbased solutions.We recommend the following definition of diagnostic inequity: the presence of preventable unwarranted variations in diagnostic processes among population groups that are socially, economically, demographically, or geographically disadvantaged. About 1 in 20 US adults experience a diagnostic error in the outpatient setting annually, 3 but this likely underestimates frequencies for marginalized patients, who face additional biases, discrimination, and structural factors. 4 Diagnostic error measurement is limited by lack of adequate data sources and rigorous and standardized methods, and precise epidemiologic data are not available. But, for marginalized patients, prevalence and factors contributing to diagnostic errors are even further underexplored—particularly where multiple social identities intersect (eg, misogynoir). Mitigation strategies are not well developed but are urgently needed. Given the barriers marginalized patients face, several
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1093/jamia/ocy182
发表时间:
2019-05-01
影响因子:
6.4
作者:
Liaw, Winston R.;Jetty, Anuradha;Bazemore, Andrew W.
通讯作者:
Bazemore, Andrew W.
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Singh H;Meyer AN;Thomas EJ
通讯作者:
Thomas EJ
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Cyril S;Smith BJ;Possamai-Inesedy A;Renzaho AM
通讯作者:
Renzaho AM
影响因子:
6
作者:
Ortega, Gezzer;Rodriguez, Jorge A.;Bates, David W.
通讯作者:
Bates, David W.
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Gordon, Howard S.;Solanki, Pooja;Gopal, Ravi K.
通讯作者:
Gopal, Ravi K.