Trichophyton mentagrophytes sive interdigitale? A dermatophyte in the course of time.

Trichophyton mentagrophytes sive interdigitale? A dermatophyte in the course of time.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1111/j.1610-0387.2007.06180.x
复制
发表时间:
2007-03-01
期刊:
Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Graser, Yvonne
Graser, Yvonne
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Nenoff, Pietro;Herrmann, Jurgen;Graser, Yvonne

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

最初,须毛癣菌 (T.) 须毛癣菌复合体区分了嗜人亚种须毛癣菌 (T. mentagrophytes var.)。趾间,T. mentagrophytes var。 nodulare(同义词 T. krajdenii)和 T. mentagrophytes var. goetzii 和嗜兽亚种 T. mentagrophytes var.颗粒状(啮齿动物),T. mentagrophytes var. erinacei(刺猬)和 T. mentagrophytes var.昆克农(小鼠)。此外,该复合体的两个有性物种(有性型)是已知的。它们是Arthroderma (A.) benhamiae Ajello and Cheng 1967 和Arthroderma vanbreuseghemii Takashio 1973。根据最近的分子研究,T.mentagrophytes 物种仅与嗜动物亚种T.mentagrophytes var. 是同义的。 quinckeanum,在西欧很少见。 T. mentagrophytes 的嗜人亚种,以及许多嗜兽菌株,以前被区分为变种。须生植物或变种。颗粒状,无法区分,现在被命名为 T.interdigitale。通过经典的显微镜和生化方法来区分嗜人性和嗜兽性T. interdigitale菌株的形态通常是有问题的。特别是,不可能区分 T. interdigitale、T. mentagrophytes 和 A. benhamiae 的无性毛癣菌的嗜动物菌株。在这些情况下,分子鉴定方法可用于回答流行病学、分类学和治疗问题。
Originally, the Trichophyton (T.) mentagrophytes complex distinguished between the anthropophilic subspecies T. mentagrophytes var. interdigitale, T. mentagrophytes var. nodulare (synonym T. krajdenii), and T. mentagrophytes var. goetzii and the zoophilic subspecies T. mentagrophytes var. granulosum (rodents), T. mentagrophytes var. erinacei (hedgehog), and T. mentagrophytes var. quinckeanum (mice). In addition, two sexual species (teleomorph) of this complex are known. These are Arthroderma (A.) benhamiae Ajello and Cheng 1967 and Arthroderma vanbreuseghemii Takashio 1973. According to recent molecular studies,the species T.mentagrophytes is synonymous with only the zoophilic subspecies T.mentagrophytes var. quinckeanum which is rare in Western Europe. The anthropophilic subspecies of T. mentagrophytes, as well as many of the zoophilic strains, formerly differentiated as var. mentagrophytes or var. granulosum, are indistinguishable and are now designated T.interdigitale. The morphological differentiation between anthropophilic and zoophilic T. interdigitale strains by classical microscopical and biochemical methods is often problematic. In particular, it is impossible to differentiate between the zoophilic strains of T. interdigitale, T. mentagrophytes, and the Trichophyton anamorph of A. benhamiae. In these cases, molecular identification methods may be applied to answer epidemiological, taxonomical and therapeutic questions.