The interactions of disability and impairment

The interactions of disability and impairment
复制标题

DOI:
10.1057/sth.2012.21
复制
发表时间:
2013-05-01
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
McLaughlin, Janice
McLaughlin, Janice
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Coleman-Fountain, Edmund;McLaughlin, Janice

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

关于残疾的理论工作正在经历一个广阔的时期,这是建立在对残疾研究作为一门学科的日益认识之上的,也是出于政治和分析的推动,残疾在塑造人们生活的交叉社会类别的描述中处于突出地位。目前在关键的残疾研究中存在的一个争论是,该研究是否应该将损伤和具体化纳入其研究重点。本文认为,它应该这样做,并通过借鉴符号互动主义和化身的文献,以探索身体可以定义为障碍的差异如何在人们如何通过社会互动来理解自己的过程中发挥作用。我们认为,这些日常的互动以及我们在其中讲述的故事和关于它们的故事是产生损伤和残疾的重要空间和叙述。互动和故事的重要性不仅体现在它们如何受到更广泛的社会规范、集体故事和制度过程的影响,还体现在它们有时如何为这些规范、故事和制度提供阻力和挑战。因此,损伤和相互作用的重要性在于它们在告知自我认同以及更广泛的权力和不平等动态方面所起的作用。社会理论与健康(2013)11,133-150。doi: 10.1057 / sth.2012.21;2012年11月14日在线发布
Theoretical work on disability is going through an expansive period, built on the growing recognition of disability studies as a discipline and out of the political and analytical push to bring disability into a prominent position within accounts of the intersecting social categories that shape people's Lives. A current debate within critical disability studies is whether that study should include impairment and embodiment within its focus. This article argues it should and does so by drawing from symbolic interactionism and embodiment literatures in order to explore how differences in what bodies can do defined as impairments come to play a role in how people make sense of themselves through social interaction. We argue that these everyday interactions and the stories we tell within them and about them are important spaces and narratives through which impairment and disability are produced. Interactions and stories are significant both in how they are shaped by wider social norms, collective stories and institutional processes, and also how they at times can provide points of resistance and challenges to such norms, stories and institutions. Therefore, the significance of impairment and interaction is the role they play in both informing self-identity and also broader dynamics of power and inequality. Social Theory & Health (2013) 11, 133-150. doi:10.1057/sth.2012.21; published online 14 November 2012