The Constitution of Responsibility: Toward an Ordonomic Framework for Interpreting (Corporate Social) Responsibility in Different Social Settings
The Constitution of Responsibility: Toward an Ordonomic Framework for Interpreting (Corporate Social) Responsibility in Different Social Settings
复制标题
责任的构成：建立一个解释不同社会环境中（企业社会）责任的秩序框架
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
I. Pies
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Markus Beckmann;I. Pies
本文从宪政经济学的角度阐释了责任的概念。运用宪法经济学，作者区分了玩游戏时的游戏内部（或亚宪法）责任和游戏环境（或宪法）责任，即创造游戏条件的责任。这两个条件被解释为不仅包括制度（游戏规则），还包括关于游戏、其缺陷和改革选择的论述。因此，作者的“秩序责任”概念区分了“治理责任”和“话语责任”。这个概念被用来批判性地讨论国家和非国家行为体之间的传统二分法。作者考察了私人行为者参与规则制定和规则发现的政治进程的能力。因此，本文为企业社会责任的争论提供了重要的概念澄清。
This article shows how taking a constitutional economics perspective can clarify the idea of responsibility. Applying constitutional economics, the authors distinguish between within-game (or sub-constitutional) responsibility when playing a game and context-of-game (or constitutional) responsibility for developing the conditions under which a game will be played. These two conditions are interpreted as comprising not only the institutions (rules of the game) but also discourse about the game, its deficiencies, and reform options. Accordingly, the authors’ concept of “ordo-responsibility” distinguishes between “governance responsibility” and “discourse responsibility.” This concept is used to critically discuss the conventional dichotomy between state and non-state actors. The authors examine the capacity of private actors to engage in political processes of rule-setting and rule-finding. The article thus provides important conceptual clarification for the debate on corporate social responsibility.
合法化的话语过程：绘制国际刑事法院案件中的说服岛
影响因子：
7.8
作者：
Deitelhoff;Nicole
通讯作者：
Nicole