Addressing urban health in Detroit, New York City, and Seattle through community-based participatory research partnerships
Addressing urban health in Detroit, New York City, and Seattle through community-based participatory research partnerships
复制标题
DOI：
10.2105/ajph.93.5.803
复制
发表时间：
2003-05-01
影响因子：
12.7
通讯作者：
Softley, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Metzler, MM;Higgins, DL;Softley, D
客观的。本研究描述了发展 3 个基于社区的参与性研究 (CBPR) 伙伴关系不可或缺的关键活动。方法。我们比较了在 3 个城市研究中心 (URC) 进行的个别案例研究的结果，以确定 CBPR 方法在伙伴关系发展的前 4 年中的跨领域适应性。结果。伙伴关系发展的关键活动包括共享决策、确定合作原则、确定研究重点和确保资金。中期成果是持续的 CBPR 伙伴关系、伙伴关系内的信任、公共卫生研究计划以及开展 CBPR 能力的提高。挑战包括有意义的合作所需的时间、对可持续资金的担忧以及与制度种族主义相关的问题。结论。 URC 的经验表明，CBPR 可以在不同的环境中成功实施。
Objective. This study describes key activities integral to the development of 3 community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships.Methods. We compared findings from individual case studies conducted at 3 urban research centers (URCs) to identify crosscutting adaptations of a CBPR approach in the first 4 years of the partnerships' development.Results. Activities critical in partnership development include sharing decision-making, defining principles of collaboration, establishing research priorities, and securing funding. Intermediate outcomes were sustained CBPR partnerships, trust within the partnerships, public health research programs, and increased capacity to conduct CBPR. Challenges included the time needed for meaningful collaboration, concerns regarding sustainable funding, and issues related to institutional racism.Conclusions. The URC experiences suggest that CBPR can be successfully implemented in diverse settings.