Moral affect: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Moral affect: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0022-3514.61.4.598
复制
发表时间:
1991-10
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
June P Tangney
June P Tangney
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
June P Tangney

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本研究采用4项独立研究,考察了大学生道德情感人格特征中的移情反应性、内疚倾向性和同情倾向性之间的关系。结果表明,羞耻和内疚是不同的情感体验,有重要的和相当不同的人际领域的影响。犯罪倾向和内疚倾向之间存在显著的正相关。尽管如此,正如预测的那样,他人导向的移情反应与羞耻倾向呈负相关,但与内疚倾向呈正相关。相比之下,一个更自我导向的个人痛苦的指数是积极的联系在一起,以自我为导向的倾向。总的来说,这些结果为羞耻的丑陋增加了一个新的维度,但也表明内疚可能并没有那么糟糕,至少在人际关系领域是这样。
The relations among 3 moral affective personality characteristics--shame-proneness, guilt-proneness, and empathic responsiveness--were examined in 4 independent studies of undergraduates. Results indicate that shame and guilt are distinct affective experiences that have important and quite different implications in the interpersonal realm. There was a substantial positive correlation between shame-proneness and guilt-proneness. Nonetheless, as predicted, other-oriented empathic responsiveness was negatively related to proneness to shame but positively correlated with proneness to guilt. In contrast, an index of more self-oriented personal distress was positively linked to shame-proneness. Taken together, these results add a new dimension to the ugliness of shame but suggest that guilt may not be that bad after all, at least in the interpersonal domain.