The New Post-suburban Politics?
The New Post-suburban Politics?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0042098011411944
复制
发表时间：
2011-09-01
期刊：
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Wood, Andrew M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Phelps, Nicholas A.;Wood, Andrew M.
定居点被称为“前城市”，“边缘城市”，“技术郊区”，被用来表示与哥伦比亚不同的东西，因此可能被认为是后郊区。现有的文献集中于将后埃塞俄比亚定义为一个新时代和一种新的定居空间形式。后利比亚是否也可以根据其独特的政治来界定，这是这里探讨的一个悬而未决的问题。本文首先考虑需要使城市政治理论更适合不同的定居点，人口密集的城市化地区的国家。本文强调了资本主义的结构特性，这些特性在城市化进程的统一性中产生了差异。然后，它讨论了什么是新的一类后郊区定居点，集中在什么样的经济重力的post-Bibia，边界后郊区社区的困难和国家的持续作用意味着理解城市政治和城市政治理论的重新制定。
Settlements variously termed 'ex-urbs', 'edge cities', 'technoburbs' are taken to signal something different from suburbia and as a consequence might be considered post-suburban. Existing literature has focused on defining post-suburbia as a new era and as a new form of settlement space. Whether post-suburbia can also be delimited in terms of its distinctive politics is the open question explored here. The paper begins by considering the need to make urban political theory more tailored to the different settlements that populate the heavily urbanised regions of nations. The paper stresses the structural properties of capitalism that generate differences within the unity of the urbanisation process. It then discusses what is new about a class of post-suburban settlements, concentrating on what the increasing economic gravity of post-suburbia, the difficulty of bounding post-suburban communities and the continuing role of the state imply for understanding urban politics and the reformulation of urban political theory.