Mortality and readmission following hip fracture surgery: a retrospective study comparing conventional and fast-track care.
Mortality and readmission following hip fracture surgery: a retrospective study comparing conventional and fast-track care.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015574
复制
发表时间:
2017-08-29
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Foss OA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Haugan K;Johnsen LG;Basso T;Foss OA
To compare the efficacies of two pathways—conventional and fast-track care—in patients with hip fracture. Retrospective single-centre study. University hospital in middle Norway. 1820 patients aged ≥65 years with hip fracture (intracapsular, intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric). 788 patients were treated according to conventional care from April 2008 to September 2011, and 1032 patients were treated according to fast-track care from October 2011 to December 2013. Primary: mortality and readmission to hospital, within 365 days follow-up. Secondary: length of stay. We found no statistically significant differences in mortality and readmission rate between patients in the fast-track and conventional care models within 365 days after the initial hospital admission. The conventional care group had a higher, no statistical significant mortality HR of 1.10 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.31, p=0.326) without and 1.16 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.40, p=0.118) with covariate adjustment. Regarding the readmission, the conventional care group sub-HR was 1.02 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.18, p=0.822) without and 0.97 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.12, p=0.644) with adjusting for covariates. Length of stay and time to surgery was statistically significant shorter for patients who received fast-track care, a mean difference of 3.4 days and 6 hours, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in sex, type of fracture, age or Charlson Comorbidity Index score at baseline between patients in the two pathways. There was insufficient evidence to show an impact of fast-track care on mortality and readmission. Length of stay and time to surgery were decreased. NCT00667914; results
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Moja L;Piatti A;Pecoraro V;Ricci C;Virgili G;Salanti G;Germagnoli L;Liberati A;Banfi G
通讯作者:
Banfi G
影响因子:
105.7
作者:
Frihagen, Frede;Nordsletten, Lars;Madsen, Jan Erik
通讯作者:
Madsen, Jan Erik
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Kristensen, Pia Kjaer;Thillemann, Theis Muncholm;Johnsen, Soren Paaske
通讯作者:
Johnsen, Soren Paaske
影响因子:
2.5
作者:
Bohm, Eric;Loucks, Lynda;Oppenheimer, Luis
通讯作者:
Oppenheimer, Luis
影响因子:
4.1
作者:
Klop, Corinne;Welsing, Paco M. J.;de Vries, Frank
通讯作者:
de Vries, Frank