Outfoxing Rejection: Urinary FOXP3 mRNA, TCMR, and the Fate of Allografts.
Outfoxing Rejection: Urinary FOXP3 mRNA, TCMR, and the Fate of Allografts.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/tp.0000000000003479
复制
发表时间:
2021-08-01
期刊:
影响因子:
6.2
通讯作者:
Menon MC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tedla FM;Sanchez Russo L;Menon MC
Histopathologic examination of allograft biopsy specimens remains the gold standard to diagnose the causes of allograft injury including acute T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR). Allograft needle biopsies suffer from sampling errors from patchy nature of pathology, as well as inter-and intraobserver variability. Additionally, the invasive nature of biopsies discourages serial sampling to assess response to therapy after TCMR. Several lines of research have thus pursued novel noninvasive biomarkers for diagnosis of rejection or prognostication of allograft fate. These have involved quantitation of gene expression profiles or cellular products of activated immune cells in blood, tissue, or urine. Translational progress in the field of noninvasive rejection diagnostics is exemplified by the adoption in clinic of gene expression profiling of peripheral mononuclear cells for immune surveillance of low-risk heart transplants as a substitute for surveillance endomyocardial biopsies. 1 Several assays are also in various stages of development for use in the care of kidney transplant recipients. 2 In this issue of Transplantation, Luan et al3 add to their existing body of work on the utility of urinary cell mRNA profiling in diagnosing or predicting the reversibility of TCMR4-6. They compared 18s rRNA-normalized logtransformed urinary cell mRNA levels of FOXP3, CD25, CD3E, and perforin in 3 subgroups of patients who participated in the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-04 (CTOT-04): patients who developed acute TCMR; patients who had no pathologic evidence of TCMR (No Rejection group); and patients with average serum creatinine≤ 2 mg/dL who had not undergone allograft biopsy and not required treatment for acute rejection, or cytomegaloviral or BK infection within 12 months of transplant (Stable group). Patients with borderline rejection, antibody-mediated rejection, or BK virus nephropathy were excluded. Median urinary levels of all mRNAs were higher in the TCMR group than the No Rejection or Stable groups. Among 33 patients in the TCMR group, median urinary cell FOXP3 mRNA level (but not other mRNAs) was higher in those with reversible TCMR (ie, 21 patients with 4-week creatinine within 15% of baseline) than in nonreversible TCMR. An 18s rRNA-normalized log-transformed urinary cell FOXP3 mRNA of–1.33 predicted TCMR reversal with a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 67%. Interestingly, prospective urinary mRNA trajectory analyses showed that patients with TCMR-reversibility had higher FOXP3 mRNA but a lower CTOT-4 signature score after TCMR treatment, whereas those with nonreversible TCMR had lower urinary FOXP3 mRNA and higher CTOT-4 signature scores (CTOT-04 signature is a composite of urinary 18s rRNA, and CD3E and interferon-inducible protein 10 [IP-10] mRNA previously associated with TCMR6). Multiple logistic regression showed urinary cell FOXP3 mRNA level predicted TCMR reversal independent of clinical variables. A predictive model for TCMR-reversibility that combined clinical variables and urinary cell FOXP3 mRNA level outperformed a model with clinical variables or FOXP3 mRNA alone. Importantly, FOXP3 mRNA levels were independently associated with improved death-censored graft survival, an association that the authors reported to be mediated through TCMR-reversibility in their adjusted analyses. The findings by Luan et al elegantly validate in an independent multicenter prospective cohort their previous report of the association between FOXP3 mRNA and TCMR-reversibility. 5 These findings could have significant potential clinical utility in tailoring the intensity of anti-TCMR therapy …