Half a century of "muddling": Are we there yet?
Half a century of "muddling": Are we there yet?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.12.001
复制
发表时间：
2011-02-01
影响因子：
9.3
通讯作者：
Saint-Martin, Denis
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Allison, Christine Rothmayr;Saint-Martin, Denis
半个世纪后出版的林德布洛姆的开创性文章“的科学得过且过”，我们重温了渐进主义的遗产在这个特殊的问题，分析其遗产在公共政策和公共行政。文章讨论了最近的理论发展在多大程度上改变了原来的想法，加强它，或可能使它过时。在这篇介绍性文章中，我们简要概述了渐进主义的核心要素，并评估了当今学术出版物和研究中如何使用这一概念。因此，我们把渐进主义作为一个分析性的概念，而不是一个规定性的理论。我们认为，即使经过了半个世纪的“得过且过”，我们还没有完成渐进主义。支持渐进主义概念的一些想法继续推动研究，通常与政策过程的最新理论方法相结合。经过半个世纪，渐进主义仍然是政策学者工具包的一部分。(C)2010年政策和社会协会（APSS）。爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
Half a century after the publication of Lindblom's seminal article "The Science of Muddling Through", we revisit the heritage of incrementalism in this special issue, analyzing its legacy in public policy and public administration. The articles discuss the extent to which recent theoretical developments have transformed the original idea, reinforced it, or possibly rendered it obsolete. In this introductory article, we provide a short overview over the core elements of incrementalism and assess how the concept is used in scholarly publications and research today. We thereby focus on incrementalism as an analytical concept rather then a prescriptive theory. We argue that even after a half a century of "muddling", we are not yet through with incrementalism. Some of the ideas that underpin the concept of incrementalism continue to drive research, often in combination with more recent theoretical approaches to the policy process. After half a century, incrementalism is still part of the policy scholar's tool kit. (C) 2010 Policy and Society Associates (APSS). Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.