Developing a Mentorship Program for Psychiatry Residents
Developing a Mentorship Program for Psychiatry Residents
复制标题
为精神病学住院医师制定指导计划
DOI：
10.1007/s40596-014-0163-2
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Mark Fefergrad
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Soklaridis;J. López;Nate Charach;K. Broad;John Teshima;Mark Fefergrad
目的对多伦多大学精神病学二年级住院医师正式导师计划实施一年后的效果进行评估。方法对10名住院医师和10名教师导师分别接受住院医师和独立研究人员的访谈，了解他们在该项目中的经历。访谈数据采用扎根理论的方法进行主题编码和分析。首先，参与者强调了为导师和被辅导者提供自然、灵活和引人入胜的配对过程的重要性。许多人经历了随机分配配对的方法和该项目的强制性，这是与他们的导师发展有意义的关系的障碍。第二，与会者表示倾向于在指导者和被辅导者工作地点之间地理位置接近，并倾向于在非正式环境中举行会议，以提高他们互动的质量和数量。最后，参与者认为应该就项目的目标传达明确的方向和期望，并需要在导师之间建立一个信息共享的论坛。结论总的来说，大多数参与者认为该项目促进了成长和发展，并为导师和学员提供了积极的机会。虽然该计划存在挑战，但与会者提出了切实的建议，以改进这一进程。
ObjectiveThe authors sought to evaluate a formal mentorship program for second-year psychiatry residents at the University of Toronto after the program’s first year of implementation.MethodsTen mentees and ten faculty mentors were interviewed by fellow second-year residents and an independent researcher, respectively, about their experiences in the program. Interview data were thematically coded and analyzed using a grounded theory approach.ResultsThree major themes were identified. First, participants emphasized the importance of a natural, flexible, and engaging matching process for mentors and mentees. Many experienced the random assignment approach to matching and the mandatory nature of the program as barriers to developing a meaningful relationship with their mentors. Second, participants expressed a preference for geographic proximity between mentor and mentee workplaces and for meetings to take place in informal settings in order to improve the quality and quantity of their interactions. Lastly, participants felt that clear directions and expectations about the program’s goals should be communicated, and that a forum for information sharing among mentors was needed.ConclusionsOverall, the majority of participants believed that the program facilitated growth and development and provided positive opportunities for both mentors and mentees. While challenges were present in the program, participants provided tangible recommendations to improve the process.