IDENTIFICATION OF CONTENT AND STYLE - 2-DIMENSIONAL INTERPRETATION OF ACQUIESCENCE
IDENTIFICATION OF CONTENT AND STYLE - 2-DIMENSIONAL INTERPRETATION OF ACQUIESCENCE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/h0031474
复制
发表时间：
1971-01-01
影响因子：
22.4
通讯作者：
MESSICK, S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BENTLER, PM;JACKSON, DN;MESSICK, S
审查在确定和核实个性清单中差异的内容和风格来源时所涉及的方法。表明反应风格差异的重要性可以忽略不计的证据似乎远远不是决定性的。先前的项目颠倒研究被认为为特定内容的反应提供了明确的证据，但被证明与区分两个默认过程的风格位置一致。对于结构性库存的反应，协议默许似乎是一个相对次要的决定因素。接受默认，例如同意或拒绝异质属性作为自我描述，似乎是一个主要的反应决定因素。在人格问卷的分析中，这两种默许通常是混淆的。总结了最近评估默许差异存在的研究。(参考文献2)(心理信息数据库记录(C)2016 APA，保留所有权利)
Reviews the methodology involved in identifying and verifying content and stylistic sources of variance in personality inventories. The evidence indicating that response style variance is of negligible importance appears to be far from conclusive. Previous item-reversal studies, which have been considered to yield unambiguous evidence for specific content responding, are shown to be consistent with a style position which differentiates 2 acquiescence processes. Agreement acquiescence, such as true-saying, appears to be a relatively minor determiner of responses to structured inventories. Acceptance acquiescence, such as subscribing to or denying heterogeneous attributes as self-descriptive, appears to be a major response determiner. These 2 types of acquiescence are usually confounded in analyses of personality inventories. Recent studies evaluating the existence of acquiescence variance are summarized.(2 P. Ref.)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)