Batting, Habit and Memory: The Embodied Mind and the Nature of Skill

Batting, Habit and Memory: The Embodied Mind and the Nature of Skill
复制标题

击球、习惯和记忆:体现的思想和技能的本质

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2007
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Sutton
J. Sutton
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Sutton

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

蟋蟀弥漫在记忆中。玩游戏和欣赏游戏都集中涉及各种形式的记忆。这篇文章的重点是明确的自传体记忆和那种习惯性或“程序性”记忆涉及复杂的体现技能,如击球之间的区别。习惯或技能记忆现象通常被认为是心理学或认知科学的领域,但在很大程度上被哲学人类学和心灵哲学所忽视。然而,当从这个角度考虑时,特别是关于击球的一些本质上有趣的问题出现了。在借鉴心理学和认知人类学的思想的同时,这一论点还得到了一般证词、板球写作、现象学和其他对具身心灵的调查的补充。虽然从流行的观点,认为太多的思考破坏了实践,具体的技能参与击球,本文认为,专家们实际上成功地学习心理技术,如何影响自己的行动,和那种明确的思想和记忆的问题本身是积极的,动态的和上下文敏感的。
Cricket is suffused in memory. Both playing and appreciating the game centrally involve various forms of remembering. This essay focuses on the distinction between explicit autobiographical remembering and the kind of habitual or ‘procedural’ memory involved in complex embodied skills like batting. Generally considered the province of psychology or cognitive science, the phenomenon of habit or skill memory has been largely neglected by philosophical anthropology and the philosophy of mind. However a number of intrinsically interesting questions concerning batting in particular arise when considered from this perspective. While drawing upon ideas from psychology and cognitive anthropology, the argument is supplemented with accounts from general testimony and cricket writing, phenomenology, and other investigations of the embodied mind. While starting from the prevalent view that thinking too much disrupts the practised, embodied skills involved in batting, the essay suggests that experts do in fact successfully learn mental techniques for how to influence themselves in action, and that the kinds of explicit thought and memory in question are themselves active, dynamic and context-sensitive.