High PEEP in acute respiratory distress syndrome: quantitative evaluation between improved arterial oxygenation and decreased oxygen delivery.
High PEEP in acute respiratory distress syndrome: quantitative evaluation between improved arterial oxygenation and decreased oxygen delivery.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1093/bja/aew314
复制
发表时间:
2016-11
影响因子:
9.8
通讯作者:
Hardman JG
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chikhani M;Das A;Haque M;Wang W;Bates DG;Hardman JG
Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is widely used to improve oxygenation and prevent alveolar collapse in mechanically ventilated patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Although PEEP improves arterial oxygenation predictably, high-PEEP strategies have demonstrated equivocal improvements in ARDS-related mortality. The effect of PEEP on tissue oxygen delivery is poorly understood and is difficult to quantify or investigate in the clinical environment. We investigated the effects of PEEP on tissue oxygen delivery in ARDS using a new, high-fidelity, computational model with highly integrated respiratory and cardiovascular systems. The model was configured to replicate published clinical trial data on the responses of 12 individual ARDS patients to changes in PEEP. These virtual patients were subjected to increasing PEEP levels during a lung-protective ventilation strategy (0–20 cm H2O). Measured variables included arterial oxygenation, cardiac output, peripheral oxygen delivery, and alveolar strain. As PEEP increased, tissue oxygen delivery decreased in all subjects (mean reduction of 25% at 20 cm H2O PEEP), despite an increase in arterial oxygen tension (mean increase 6.7 kPa at 20 cm H2O PEEP). Changes in arterial oxygenation and tissue oxygen delivery differed between subjects but showed a consistent pattern. Static and dynamic alveolar strain decreased in all patients as PEEP increased. Incremental PEEP in ARDS appears to protect alveoli and improve arterial oxygenation, but also appears to impair tissue oxygen delivery significantly because of reduced cardiac output. We propose that this trade-off may explain the poor improvements in mortality associated with high-PEEP ventilation strategies.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Hardman, JG;Bedforth, NM;Aitkenhead, AR
通讯作者:
Aitkenhead, AR
DOI:
10.1186/s13054-014-0723-6
发表时间:
2015-01-12
期刊:
Critical care (London, England)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Das A;Cole O;Chikhani M;Wang W;Ali T;Haque M;Bates DG;Hardman JG
通讯作者:
Hardman JG
DOI:
10.1164/ajrccm.164.1.2007011
发表时间:
2001-07-01
影响因子:
24.7
作者:
Crotti, S;Mascheroni, D;Gattinoni, L
通讯作者:
Gattinoni, L
影响因子:
9.6
作者:
DANTZKER, DR;LYNCH, JP;WEG, JG
通讯作者:
WEG, JG
DOI:
10.1164/ajrccm.156.5.9604081
发表时间:
1997-11-01
影响因子:
24.7
作者:
Carvalho, CRR;Barbas, CSV;Amato, MBP
通讯作者:
Amato, MBP