Relation between ambulatory actigraphy and laboratory polysomnography in insomnia practice and research
Relation between ambulatory actigraphy and laboratory polysomnography in insomnia practice and research
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/jsr.12854
复制
发表时间：
2019-08-01
影响因子：
4.4
通讯作者：
Roehrs, Timothy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Withrow, Dana;Roth, Thomas;Roehrs, Timothy
由于其成本相对较低、受试者负担较轻，在实践和研究中得到越来越多的应用。在失眠症患者中，多夜在家活动描记术与一晚独立实验室多导睡眠描记术（PSG）的对比还没有被研究过。与自动程序分析（AUTO）相比，使用事件标记（MARK）来设定床上时间（TIB）尚未得到系统的评估。受试者（n = 30）符合DSM-5失眠和实验室PSG睡眠效率（SE）标准
Actigraphy is increasingly used in practice and research studies because of its relative low cost and decreased subject burden. How multiple nights of at-home actigraphy compare to one independent night of in-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) has not been examined in people with insomnia. Using event markers (MARK) to set time in bed (TIB) compared to automatic program analysis (AUTO) has not been systematically evaluated. Subjects (n = 30) meeting DSM-5 criteria for insomnia and in-laboratory PSG sleep efficiency (SE) of