Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias
Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.015
复制
发表时间:
2004-04-01
影响因子:
7.2
通讯作者:
Anderson, CS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bennett, DA;Latham, NK;Anderson, CS
Objectives: Publication bias is a problem in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of publication bias in a systematic review of the effectiveness of Progressive Resistance Training (PRT) in older people.Study Design and Setting: The relevant studies were ascertained from three sources: electronic databases, experts, and handsearching. Capture-recapture, visual inspection of funnel plots, two statistical tests, and two methods that make adjustments for publication bias, were employed to check the robustness of the conclusions of the systematic review.Results: The methods employed gave broadly consistent results. Capture-recapture estimated that 3 (95% CI [1,15]) relevant studies were missed, while Trim and Fill suggested 16 studies had been missed. Both Egger's test for bias and a funnel plot regression approach suggested that publication bias was present. A selection model approach suggested that the funnel plot asymmetry observed may not be entirely due to publication bias.Conclusion: Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias. Further research in the form of simulation studies is required, using a variety of scenarios to investigate the extent to which each method approximates the truth. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.