Is the Divide a Chasm?: Bridging Affective Science with Clinical Practice.
Is the Divide a Chasm?: Bridging Affective Science with Clinical Practice.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10862-015-9525-7
复制
发表时间：
2016-03
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Rottenberg J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bylsma LM;Mauss IB;Rottenberg J
这个特殊的部分致力于促进将基于生物学的情绪评估整合到临床环境中。这一目标与研究领域标准(RDoC)倡议是一致的，该倡议旨在确定精神障碍背后的跨诊断生物行为机制。我们专注于将关于情绪和情绪调节的生物信息研究应用到临床环境中的四个挑战：(1)我们如何在RDoC框架中评估情绪？(2)我们如何在更广泛的背景下将情绪测量与其他系统相结合？(3)关于临床现象，情绪的生理指数告诉我们什么？以及(4)如何将生理评估整合到临床实践中？在本评论中，我们参考这一特别部分中的文章来阐述我们的观点，并在可能的情况下就继续应对这些挑战的未来工作提出建议。
This special section endeavors to facilitate the integration of biologically-based assessments of emotion into the clinical setting. This goal is consistent with the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative, which aims to identify transdiagnostic biobehavioral mechanisms that underlie mental disorders. We focus on four challenges to applying biologically-informed research on emotion and emotion regulation to clinical contexts: (1) How do we assess emotion in an RDoC framework? (2) How do we integrate measures of emotion with other systems in a wider context? (3) What do physiological indices of emotion tell us about clinical phenomena? and (4) How do we integrate physiological assessments into clinical practice? Throughout this comment, we refer to the articles in this special section to make our points, and, when possible, offer suggestions for future work to continue to address these challenges.