Comparison of predicted and perceived pain from epidural and spinal puncture in patients undergoing elective caesarean section
Comparison of predicted and perceived pain from epidural and spinal puncture in patients undergoing elective caesarean section
复制标题
DOI:
10.1177/0310057x1103900418
复制
发表时间:
2011-07-01
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
Tsuneyoshi, I.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yano, T.;Iwasaki, T.;Tsuneyoshi, I.
The intensity of pain expected by patients before an epidural and/or a spinal puncture is uncertain. The main purpose of this study was to identify and compare the intensity of pain predicted and perceived by patients having an epidural and a spinal procedure. After screening for relevant exclusion criteria, 50 women who were undergoing elective caesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia (double-segment technique) were enrolled in the study. Infiltration anaesthesia prior to needle insertion was performed for the epidural but not the spinal puncture. Pain assessments, using a 100 mm visual analogue pain scale, were made before (predicted pain) and after (perceived pain) the epidural and the spinal puncture. Predicted pain for epidural and spinal insertion (epidural 60.6 +/- 20.5 mm, spinal: 55.1 +/- 24 mm) was significantly higher than the pain perceived (epidural 36.3 +/- 20 mm, spinal 46.1 +/- 23.2 mm) (epidural P < 0.001, spinal P=0.031). Patients who were scheduled for an elective caesarean section under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia predicted 1.2- to 1.7-fold stronger pain intensity than they perceived during the procedure. Patients should be informed that a regional anaesthetic, especially epidural, procedure is often less painful than the patient's expectation.