Two Years On: The Destinations of Young People who are Not in Education, Employment or Training at 16
Two Years On: The Destinations of Young People who are Not in Education, Employment or Training at 16
复制标题
两年后：16 岁未接受教育、就业或培训的年轻人的去向
DOI：
10.1080/13676260500149287
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Joanne Rennison
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Maguire;Joanne Rennison
本文从英国教育赡养费(EMA)试点的评估中获得证据，以探讨保持全日制学习的经济激励在多大程度上阻止年轻人进入“非教育、就业或培训”(NEET)群体。评估的证据表明，付钱让年轻人留在学校对防止一些年轻人进入NEET群体产生了积极影响。然而，EMA在吸引年轻人重返全日制教育方面就不那么成功了，因为他们一旦加入了NEET群体。此外，虽然有人可能会争辩说，环境管理协会在提高16岁后参与率和保留率方面的成功是通过从政府支持的培训中“挖走”年轻人实现的，但对环境管理协会飞行员进行评估的统计证据表明，情况并非如此。最后，本文探讨了年轻人所使用的决策策略以及他们在离开义务教育之前获得信息、建议和指导的途径，以突出随后进入NEET群体的年轻人所面临的特殊困难。
This paper draws on evidence from the evaluation of the piloting of the Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) in England, to explore the extent to which a financial incentive to remain in full-time learning prevents young people entering the ‘not in education, employment or training’ (NEET) group. Evidence from the evaluation would suggest that paying young people to stay on at school has made a positive impact on preventing some young people entering the NEET group. However, the EMA was less successful in attracting young people back into full-time education once they had entered the NEET group. In addition, while it might have been argued that the success of the EMA in increasing post-16 participation and retention rates has been achieved through ‘poaching’ young people from government-supported training, the statistical evidence from the evaluation of the EMA pilots indicated that this was not the case. Finally, the paper explores the decision-making strategies employed by young people and their access to information, advice and guidance before they leave compulsory education, in order to highlight the particular difficulties faced by young people who subsequently enter the NEET group.