The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample
The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample
复制标题
DOI：
10.1348/0144665031752934
复制
发表时间：
2004-09-01
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Henry, JD
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Crawford, JR;Henry, JD
目标.评价PANAS量表（沃森，Clark，& Tellegen，1988 b）的信度和效度，并提供规范性数据。横截面和相关性。PANAS用于非临床样本，广泛代表一般成人英国人群（N = 1，003）。采用验证性因子分析对PANAS潜在结构的竞争模型进行了评价。采用回归分析和相关分析，探讨人口学变量对PANAS评分的影响，以及PANAS与抑郁、焦虑量表（HADS和DASS）之间的关系。PANAS潜在结构的最佳拟合模型（稳健比较拟合指数= 0.94）由对应于PA和NA量表的两个相关因子组成，并允许来自相同情绪子类别的项目之间的相关误差（Zevon & Tellegen，1982）。人口统计学变量只有非常温和的影响PANAS评分和PANAS表现出测量不变性的人口统计学亚组。PANAS的信度较高，PANAS与DASS和HADS的关系符合三方理论。PANAS是一个可靠的和有效的措施的结构，它的目的是评估，虽然PA和NA之间的完全独立的假设必须被拒绝。通过提供大规模的规范性数据，这一措施的效用得到加强。
Objectives. To evaluate the reliability and validity of the PANAS (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988b) and provide normative data.Design. Cross-sectional and correlational.Method. The PANAS was administered to a non-clinical sample, broadly representative of the general adult UK population (N = 1,003). Competing models of the latent structure of the PANAS were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis. Regression and correlational analysis were used to determine the influence of demographic variables on PANAS scores as well as the relationship between the PANAS with measures of depression and anxiety (the HADS and the DASS).Results. The best-fitting model (robust comparative fit index = .94) of the latent structure of the PANAS consisted of two correlated factors corresponding to the PA and NA scales, and permitted correlated error between items drawn from the same mood subcategories (Zevon & Tellegen, 1982). Demographic variables had only very modest influences on PANAS scores and the PANAS exhibited measurement invariance across demographic subgroups. The reliability of the PANAS was high, and the pattern of relationships between the PANAS and the DASS and HADS were consistent with tripartite theory.Conclusion. The PANAS is a reliable and valid measure of the constructs it was intended to assess, although the hypothesis of complete independence between PA and NA must be rejected. The utility of this measure is enhanced by the provision of large-scale normative data.