Functionalisation, separation and solvation: general discussion.
Functionalisation, separation and solvation: general discussion.
复制标题
功能化、分离和溶剂化：一般性讨论。
DOI：
10.1039/c4fd90045f
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Martín N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Martín N
菲利普·戴维斯回答说：我们确实非常仔细地研究了C(1S)光谱，但我们使用的是单晶样品，而不是高比表面积的粉末，而且我们处理的表面浓度(~20-30%单分子膜)太小，不能与整体C(1S)背景产生明显的差异。然而，我们对我们的分配持异议的原因有几个：第一，我们只在有非常好的证据表明存在峰的地方绘制t曲线；第二，我们已经针对来自不同样品的一系列光谱测试了曲线ts，并且一致性很好；最后，我们此后使用硝酸代替盐酸重复了这项研究，并获得了非常相似的结果。1
Philip Davies replied: We did look very carefully at the C (1s) spectra but we are working with a single crystal sample rather than a high surface area powder and the surface concentrations we are dealing with (~ 20–30% monolayer) are too small to make a signi cant difference against the bulk C (1s) background. However, we are con dent of our assignments for a number of reasons: rstly, we only curve t where there is very good evidence that a peak is present; secondly, the curve ts have been tested against a series of spectra from different samples and the agreement is excellent; nally, we have since repeated this study using nitric acid in place of HCl and have obtained very similar results. 1