Training partnership dyads for community-based participatory research: strategies and lessons learned from the Community Engaged Scholars Program.
Training partnership dyads for community-based participatory research: strategies and lessons learned from the Community Engaged Scholars Program.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1524839912461273
复制
发表时间：
2013-07
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Slaughter S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Andrews JO;Cox MJ;Newman SD;Gillenwater G;Warner G;Winkler JA;White B;Wolf S;Leite R;Ford ME;Slaughter S
本文介绍了一个独特的校园社区培训倡议，以社区为基础的参与式研究（CBPR）的发展，实施，评估框架和初步成果。南卡罗来纳州社区卫生伙伴关系临床和转化研究中心作为该机构的临床转化和科学奖社区参与计划，领导了被称为社区研究学者计划（CES-P）的培训计划。CES-P为CBPR团队提供同步培训，每个团队至少由一个社区合作伙伴和一个学术合作伙伴组成。计划内容包括为期12个月的每月互动小组会议，有学徒机会的指导，以及为CBPR试点项目提供资金。修改后的RE-AIM（覆盖、有效性、采用、实施、维护）框架指导过程、影响和结果评估计划。经验教训包括CBPR合作伙伴之间准备程度不同的小组教学挑战，与社区共同调查人员一起浏览机构审查委员会过程，并找到合适的学术调查人员以匹配社区研究兴趣。未来的方向建议，这种有前途的和独特的学术和社区合作伙伴的二元培训。
This article describes the development, implementation, evaluation framework, and initial outcomes of a unique campus–community training initiative for community-based participatory research (CBPR). The South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Center for Community Health Partnerships, which functions as the institution’s Clinical Translational and Science Award Community Engagement Program, leads the training initiative known as the Community Engaged Scholars Program (CES-P). The CES-P provides simultaneous training to CBPR teams, with each team consisting of at least one community partner and one academic partner. Program elements include 12 months of monthly interactive group sessions, mentorship with apprenticeship opportunities, and funding for a CBPR pilot project. A modified RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework guides the process, impact, and outcome evaluation plan. Lessons learned include challenges of group instruction with varying levels of readiness among the CBPR partners, navigating the institutional review board process with community co-investigators, and finding appropriate academic investigators to match community research interests. Future directions are recommended for this promising and unique dyadic training of academic and community partners.