TEST RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE MINNESOTA LEISURE-TIME PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE
TEST RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE MINNESOTA LEISURE-TIME PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/0021-9681(86)90195-5
复制
发表时间：
1986-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
KNUDSEN, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
FOLSOM, AR;JACOBS, DR;KNUDSEN, J
明尼苏达州休闲时间体力活动问卷的重测信度进行了评估，两次管理的问卷在5周的时间间隔在140名成年人从一般人群样本和在两周的时间间隔在150名男性参与者的多危险因素干预试验（MRFIT）。在这两个研究人群中，有一个轻微的，非显着的下降之间的测试和重新测试的休闲时间的能量消耗。最大的重测差异估计的能量消耗被发现在那些报告更高水平的能量消耗。尽管如此，在两个研究人群中，总活动的受试者和复检者之间的斯皮尔曼等级相关系数为0.88，轻度、中度和重度强度亚类之间的等级相关系数范围为0.69-0.86。high.sbd.0.79明尼苏达闲暇时间体力活动问卷的高可靠性证实了其在流行病学研究中的实用性。
The test-retest reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire was assessed by two administrations of the questionnaire at a five-week interval in 140 adults from a general population sample and at a two-week interval in 150 male participants in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). In both study populations, there was a slight, nonsignificant drop in reported leisure time energy expenditure between the test and the retest. The largest test-retest differences in estimated energy expenditure were found among those reporting greater levels of energy expenditure. Nevertheless, in both study populations Spearman rank correlation coefficients between the test and retest were high.sbd.0.79 to 0.88 for total activity and ranging 0.69-0.86 among the light, moderate, and heavy intensity subcategories. The high reliability of the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire corroborates its utility in epidemiologic research.