Adjustment, Conservatism, and Marital Conventionalization
Adjustment, Conservatism, and Marital Conventionalization
复制标题
调整、保守主义和婚姻传统化
DOI：
10.2307/349634
复制
发表时间：
1972
影响因子：
6
通讯作者：
Beverly Dibatista
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Vernon H. Edmonds;G. Withers;Beverly Dibatista
来自三个独立样本的数据表明，婚姻适应量表一般，特别是洛克-华莱士量表，严重污染的主题的倾向，扭曲他们的婚姻的社会可取性的方向的评价。当这种扭曲的趋势，这里定义为婚姻习俗化，保持不变，通过偏相关技术，没有显着的相关性之间的婚姻调整的测量和传统的家庭道德，宗教活动，禁欲主义道德，教堂出席，或婚前性禁欲的保守指数。然而，婚姻适应和一般保守的意识形态之间出现了实质性的负相关。如果一个人研究一下有关婚姻和家庭生活的科学和知识，他会发现一种普遍的信念，以不同程度的谨慎和普遍性表达，即具有保守观点和行为的人比不分享这种保守观点和行为的人更幸福。当然，这种信念源于美国社会的习俗，但在20世纪20年代和30年代，有关婚姻幸福的科学研究的出版和传播，在逻辑上得到了支持（戴维斯，1929;伯吉斯和科特雷尔，1939;特曼，1938）。Terman的保守求和
Data from three independent samples indicate that marital adjustment scales in general, and the Locke-Wallace Scale in particular, are heavily contaminated by subjects' tendencies to distort the appraisals of their marriages in the direction of social desirability. When this distorting tendency, defined here as marital conventionalization, is held constant via partial correlation techniques, no significant correlations remain between marital adjustment as measured and the conservative indexes of traditional family morality, religious activity, ascetic morality, church attendance, or premarital sexual abstinence. A substantial negative correlation emerges, however, between marital adjustment and general conservative ideology. If one looks into the science and lore dealing with marriage and family life he will encounter a widespread conviction, expressed with varying degrees of caution and generality, that persons with conservative perspectives and behavior are more happily married than persons who do not share such conservative perspectives and behavior. This conviction, of course, had its origin in the mores of American society, but was logically buttressed by the publication and dissemination of scientific studies of marital happiness in the nineteen twenties and thirties (Davis, 1929; Burgess and Cottrell, 1939; Terman, 1938). Terman's summation of the conservative