THE ONLY PRESENCE OF SPERM IN URINE DOES NOT IMPLY RETROGRADE EJACULATION
THE ONLY PRESENCE OF SPERM IN URINE DOES NOT IMPLY RETROGRADE EJACULATION
复制标题
尿液中唯一存在精子并不意味着逆行射精
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2005
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
S. Curi
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Ariagno;G. Mendeluk;M. N. Pugliese;S. Sardi;C. Acuna;H. Repetto;S. Curi
This is a retrospective study of clinical experience collected at the University Clinical Hospital over a 19-year period. Semen samples were analyzed according to WHO criteria. In the postmasturbatory urine, sperm count was performed. Data were expressed as total sperm number in urine (TSNU) and using a retroejaculation index. Patients were categorized into four groups according to the presence of sperm in the studied samples: a) in semen and urine; b) only in urine; c) only in semen; d) neither in semen nor in urine. A control group included nonretroejaculator patients. Retroejaculator patients are those whose TSNU is superior to 3.8 × 106 and the RI superior to 2.16%. While diagnosing retroejaculation, the only presence of sperm in the postmasturbatory urine is not adequate. The proposed index added to total sperm number in urine and semen volume may identify true retroejaculator patients.