Cinderella revisited: A comparison of fluent and non-fluent aphasic speech
Cinderella revisited: A comparison of fluent and non-fluent aphasic speech
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/0911-6044(96)00006-1
复制
发表时间：
1996-07-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Franklin, S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bird, H;Franklin, S
使用Saffran、Berndt和Schwartz等人（Brain and Language 37，440-479，1989）设计的定量方法分析了两名流利和三名非流利失语症患者的言语[6]。语法缺失和非语法缺失失语症之间的差异被广泛复制，因为非语法缺失、不流利的患者仅在句法复杂性和形式良好性方面受到损害。流利的患者的句子生产是没有区别的，从非流利的non-agrammatics，除了就流利本身。所有五名患者在第一次采样后1-2年重新测试。在定量分析中有改善的两名患者在图片命名方面表现出类似的改善。至少对一名患者来说，低频名词的可用性增加似乎是这种改善的基础。版权所有（C）1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
The speech of two fluent and three non-fluent aphasic patients was analysed using the quantitative method devised by Saffran, Berndt and Schwartz et al. (Brain and Language 37, 440-479, 1989) [6]. The differences between agrammatic and non-agrammatic aphasic speech were broadly replicated, in that the non-agrammatic non-fluent patients were impaired only on measures of syntactic complexity and well-formedness. The fluent patients' sentence production was indistinguishable from that of the non-fluent non-agrammatics, except with respect to fluency itself. All five patients were retested 1-2 years after the first sample. The two patients who had improved in the quantitative analysis showed a similar improvement in picture naming. For one patient at least, an increased availability of low-frequency nouns appeared to be underlying this improvement. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd