Effects of Speed, Cyclicity, and Dimensionality on Distancing, Time, and Preference in Human-Aerial Vehicle Interactions
Effects of Speed, Cyclicity, and Dimensionality on Distancing, Time, and Preference in Human-Aerial Vehicle Interactions
复制标题
速度、循环性和维度对人机交互中的距离、时间和偏好的影响
DOI：
10.1145/2983927
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Murphy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Brittany A. Duncan;R. Murphy
本文将提出一种基于仿真的方法来测试受昆虫和动物运动启发的小型无人机（sUAV）行为中的多个变量，以了解这些变量如何影响人机交互（HRI）中的交互时间，交互偏好和距离。以前的工作主要集中在交流飞行的方向性，机器人的意图，以及sUAV中的运动感知，而涉及与这些车辆直接距离的交互仅限于一项研究（可能是由于安全问题）。这项研究发生在一个洞穴自动虚拟环境（CAVE），以保持规模感和沉浸感与用户，同时也允许安全的互动。此外，两个替代的强制选择的方法是作为一种独特的方法来研究的配置HRI，以研究这些变量的影响偏好，并允许参与者选择是否与特定的机器人进行交互。本文将有助于sUAV技术的最终用户根据其应用鼓励适当的距离，HRI的从业人员了解这种新方法的使用，以及人类飞行器研究人员了解64名天真用户对这些飞行器的看法。结果表明，低速（0.27m，p < 0.02）和高旋回性（0.28米，p < 0.01）表情可以用来增加距离;低速（4.4s，p < 0.01）和三维（2.6s，p < 0.01）表达可以用于减少交互时间;并且低速（10.4%，p < 0.01）表达对于人-飞行器交互中的通过性是不太优选的。
This article will present a simulation-based approach to testing multiple variables in the behavior of a small Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (sUAV), inspired by insect and animal motions, to understand how these variables impact time of interaction, preference for interaction, and distancing in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Previous work has focused on communicating directionality of flight, intentionality of the robot, and perception of motion in sUAVs, while interactions involving direct distancing from these vehicles have been limited to a single study (likely due to safety concerns). This study takes place in a Cave Automatic Virtual Environment (CAVE) to maintain a sense of scale and immersion with the users, while also allowing for safe interaction. Additionally, the two-alternative forced-choice method is employed as a unique methodology to the study of collocated HRI in order to both study the impact of these variables on preference and allow participants to choose whether or not to interact with a specific robot. This article will be of interest to end-users of sUAV technologies to encourage appropriate distancing based on their application, practitioners in HRI to understand the use of this new methodology, and human-aerial vehicle researchers to understand the perception of these vehicles by 64 naive users. Results suggest that low speed (by 0.27m, p < 0.02) and high cyclicity (by 0.28m, p < 0.01) expressions can be used to increase distancing; that low speed (by 4.4s, p < 0.01) and three-dimensional (by 2.6s, p < 0.01) expressions can be used to decrease time of interaction; and low speed (by 10.4%, p < 0.01) expressions are less preferred for passability in human-aerial vehicle interactions.
影响因子：
--
作者：
LEGGE, GE;FOLEY, JM
通讯作者：
FOLEY, JM