Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Alternative Measures of Maladaptive Personality Traits

Convergent and Discriminant Validity of Alternative Measures of Maladaptive Personality Traits
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/pas0000282
复制
发表时间:
2016-12-01
影响因子:
3.6
通讯作者:
Widiger, Thomas A.
Widiger, Thomas A.
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Crego, Cristina;Widiger, Thomas A.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本研究的目的是实证检验3个最近开发的适应不良人格特质的替代测量方法的收敛和区分效度:精神障碍诊断和统计手册人格量表-第五版(DSM-5,PID-5; Krueger,Derringer,Markon,沃森,& Skodol,2012),计算机化适应性测试-人格障碍静态形式(CAT-PD-SF; Simms等人,2011)和五因素模型人格障碍量表(FFMPD; Widiger,Lynam,米勒,& Oltmanns,2012)。这些措施是建立在不同的理论基础和方法,但结果是高度一致的。PID-5和CAT-PD-SF对286名目前或有精神健康治疗史的社区成年人进行了管理; CAT-PD-SF和FFMPD量表对262名此类成年人进行了管理; PID-5和FFMPD量表对266名成年人进行了管理。结果表明,良好的内部一致性,以及良好的收敛性和判别效度的大多数规模与一些显着的例外。为今后的研究提供了建议,包括规模是独特的各自的工具,复制的依赖性因素,探索的基础上可疑的收敛或判别有效性的情况下,潜在的好处。
The purpose of the current study was to test empirically the convergent and discriminant validity of 3 recently developed, alternative measures of maladaptive personality traits: the Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (DSM-5, PID-5; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol, 2012), the Computerized Adaptive Test-Personality Disorder Static Form (CAT-PD-SF; Simms et al., 2011), and Five Factor Model Personality Disorder scales (FFMPD; Widiger, Lynam, Miller, & Oltmanns, 2012). These measures were constructed with different rationales and methods, yet the result was highly congruent. The PID-5 and CAT-PD-SF were administered to 286 community adults with current or a history of mental health treatment; the CAT-PD-SF and FFMPD scales to 262 such adults; and the PID-5 and FFMPD scales to 266. The results indicated good to excellent internal consistency, as well as good to excellent convergent and discriminant validity for most scales with a few notable exceptions. Suggestions for future research are provided, including the potential benefits of scales that are unique to a respective instrument, replication of a dependency factor, and exploration as to the basis for instances of questionable convergent or discriminant validity.