The write way to spell: printing vs. typing effects on orthographic learning.
The write way to spell: printing vs. typing effects on orthographic learning.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00117
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Tims T
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ouellette G;Tims T
先前的研究表明，相对于重复的阅读，通过拼写练习可以获得上级的正字法学习。拼写在记忆中建立详细的正字法表征方面的这种优势的一种机制是在印刷或书写中引起的手动运动的运动成分。本研究通过测试打字与印刷对拼写练习所获得的正字法学习的影响来直接探讨这一论点，并进一步评估练习方式是否与预先存在的个人特征相互作用。40名二年级学生（平均年龄7岁5个月）被介绍给10个新的非词。一些学生通过打印练习拼写，而另一些学生则在键盘上练习拼写。参与者在1天和7天后接受了这些项目的识别和拼写测试。结果显示，高利率的正字法学习的实践方式，测试时间，或后测试方式没有主要影响。分层回归分析显示，打字熟练度和实践模式之间的相互作用，如预先存在的键盘输入技能限制或促进学习打字练习组内。在印刷组中，印刷技能和学习之间没有发现类似的相互作用。结果进行了讨论，参考突出的阅读理论和教育应用。
Prior research has shown superior orthographic learning resulting from spelling practice relative to repeated reading. One mechanism proposed to underlie this advantage of spelling in establishing detailed orthographic representations in memory is the motoric component of the manual movements evoked in printing or writing. This study investigated this contention directly by testing the effects of typing vs. printing on the orthographic learning achieved through spelling practice, and further evaluated whether practice modality interacts with pre-existing individual characteristics. Forty students in grade 2 (mean age 7 years 5 months) were introduced to 10 novel non-words. Some of the students practiced spelling the items by printing, while the others practiced spelling them on a keyboard. Participants were tested for recognition and spelling of these items 1 and 7 days later. Results revealed high rates of orthographic learning with no main effects of practice modality, testing time, or post-test modality. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed an interaction between typing proficiency and practice modality, such that pre-existing keyboarding skills constrained or facilitated learning within the typing-practice group. A similar interaction was not found between printing skills and learning within the printing group. Results are discussed with reference to both prominent reading theory and educational applications.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
Kim, Young-Suk;Al Otaiba, Stephanie;Puranik, Cynthia;Folsom, Jessica Sidler;Gruelich, Luana
通讯作者：
Gruelich, Luana
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Nation, Kate;Angell, Philip;Castles, Anne
通讯作者：
Castles, Anne
影响因子：
1.5
作者：
Berninger, VW;Abbott, RD;Apel, K
通讯作者：
Apel, K
影响因子：
4.9
作者：
Conrad, Nicole J.
通讯作者：
Conrad, Nicole J.
影响因子：
2.6
作者：
Ouellette, Gene
通讯作者：
Ouellette, Gene