Protocol for a qualitative study to explore acceptability, barriers and facilitators of the implementation of new teleophthalmology technologies between community optometry practices and hospital eye services.
Protocol for a qualitative study to explore acceptability, barriers and facilitators of the implementation of new teleophthalmology technologies between community optometry practices and hospital eye services.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060810
复制
发表时间：
2022-07-20
期刊：
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Balaskas, Konstantinos
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Blandford, Ann;Abdi, Sarah;Aristidou, Angela;Carmichael, Josie;Cappellaro, Giulia;Hussain, Rima;Balaskas, Konstantinos
新颖的远程眼科技术有可能减少社区验光诊所和医院眼科服务之间不必要和不准确的转诊，从而改善患者获得适当和及时的眼科护理的机会。然而，人们对这些技术在现实生活中的可接受性、促进因素和障碍知之甚少。一项理论上的定性研究将探讨患者和医疗保健专业人员对远程眼科和人工智能决策支持系统护理模型的看法。将结合社区验光实践和医院眼科服务的现场观察、对患者和医疗保健专业人员的半结构化定性访谈以及医疗保健专业人员的自我录音。参与者将从 4 至 5 家医院眼科服务机构和 6 至 8 家附属社区验光诊所中精心挑选。目标是从医院眼科服务和社区验光诊所招募 30-36 名患者和 30 名医疗保健专业人员。所有采访都将在参与者许可的情况下进行录音，并逐字转录。来自访谈、观察和自我录音的数据将进行主题分析，并通过标准化过程理论和归纳方法进行了解。已获得伦敦-布罗姆利研究伦理委员会的伦理批准。研究结果将通过眼科、卫生服务研究、管理研究和人机交互方面的学术期刊和会议进行报告。
Novel teleophthalmology technologies have the potential to reduce unnecessary and inaccurate referrals between community optometry practices and hospital eye services and as a result improve patients’ access to appropriate and timely eye care. However, little is known about the acceptability and facilitators and barriers to the implementations of these technologies in real life. A theoretically informed, qualitative study will explore patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perspectives on teleophthalmology and Artificial Intelligence Decision Support System models of care. A combination of situated observations in community optometry practices and hospital eye services, semistructured qualitative interviews with patients and healthcare professionals and self-audiorecordings of healthcare professionals will be conducted. Participants will be purposively selected from 4 to 5 hospital eye services and 6–8 affiliated community optometry practices. The aim will be to recruit 30–36 patients and 30 healthcare professionals from hospital eye services and community optometry practices. All interviews will be audiorecorded, with participants’ permission, and transcribed verbatim. Data from interviews, observations and self-audiorecordings will be analysed thematically and will be informed by normalisation process theory and an inductive approach. Ethical approval has been received from London-Bromley research ethics committee. Findings will be reported through academic journals and conferences in ophthalmology, health services research, management studies and human-computer interaction.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Han JED;Liu X;Bunce C;Douiri A;Vale L;Blandford A;Lawrenson J;Hussain R;Grimaldi G;Learoyd AE;Kernohan A;Dinah C;Minos E;Sim D;Aslam T;Patel PJ;Denniston AK;Keane PA;Balaskas K
通讯作者：
Balaskas K
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Bouamrane, Matt-Mouley;Mair, Frances S.
通讯作者：
Mair, Frances S.
制定和评估复杂的干预措施：新的医学研究委员会指南。
DOI：
10.1136/bmj.a1655
发表时间：
2008-09-29
期刊：
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Craig P;Dieppe P;Macintyre S;Michie S;Nazareth I;Petticrew M;Medical Research Council Guidance
通讯作者：
Medical Research Council Guidance
影响因子：
7.4
作者：
Greenhalgh T;Wherton J;Papoutsi C;Lynch J;Hughes G;A'Court C;Hinder S;Fahy N;Procter R;Shaw S
通讯作者：
Shaw S
影响因子：
8.1
作者：
Burlina, Philippe M.;Joshi, Neil;Bressler, Neil M.
通讯作者：
Bressler, Neil M.