AMETA-ANALYSIS OF HYPNOSIS FOR CHRONIC PAIN PROBLEMS: A Comparison Between Hypnosis, Standard Care, and Other Psychological Interventions
AMETA-ANALYSIS OF HYPNOSIS FOR CHRONIC PAIN PROBLEMS: A Comparison Between Hypnosis, Standard Care, and Other Psychological Interventions
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00207144.2013.841471
复制
发表时间：
2014-01-02
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Sasaki, Jun
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Adachi, Tomonori;Fujino, Haruo;Sasaki, Jun
催眠被认为是治疗心理和身体疾病的有效方法。然而，其作为治疗慢性疼痛策略的有效性尚未通过荟萃分析方法进行评估。本研究的目的是进行荟萃分析，以评估催眠治疗慢性疼痛的疗效。与标准治疗相比，催眠提供了中等的治疗益处。对于非头痛组，与其他心理干预相比，催眠也显示出中等上级效果。结果表明，催眠是有效的管理慢性疼痛。鉴于纳入研究的异质性很大，催眠治疗的性质进行了进一步讨论。
Hypnosis is regarded as an effective treatment for psychological and physical ailments. However, its efficacy as a strategy for managing chronic pain has not been assessed through meta-analytical methods. The objective of the current study was to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of hypnosis for managing chronic pain. When compared with standard care, hypnosis provided moderate treatment benefit. Hypnosis also showed a moderate superior effect as compared to other psychological interventions for a nonheadache group. The results suggest that hypnosis is efficacious for managing chronic pain. Given that large heterogeneity among the included studies was identified, the nature of hypnosis treatment is further discussed.