Open Research Online Sustainable Intensification: Agroecological Appropriation or Contestation?

Open Research Online Sustainable Intensification: Agroecological Appropriation or Contestation?
复制标题

在线开放研究可持续集约化:农业生态拨款还是争议?

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
L. Levidow
L. Levidow
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
D.Constance;J. Konefal;M. Hatanaka;L. Levidow

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

至少在过去的十年里,全球机构一直在促进可持续集约化(SI),通过包括农业生态方法在内的广泛的“工具包”来提高产量,减少环境危害。在欧洲,农业集约化有多种形式和政策议程。SI一直倡导通过使农民的耕作方法更具市场竞争力来帮助农民留在土地上,同时保护其他地方的生物多样性;这种方法补充了土地节约战略。相比之下,一个不同的强化议程促进生物多样性的农业生态系统,补充土地共享战略。农学加强农业生态集约化的新途径应该超越耕地或特定景观中的物种混合。它们应探索在复杂的社会生态系统范围内运作的理想特性和机制,即考虑到农业生态系统中的社会和生态动态和相互作用(Doré等人,2011:203)。减少动物福利和生物多样性投入的新方法
For at least the past decade, global institutions have been promoting sustainable intensification (SI) to raise yields with less environmental harm through a broad ‘toolkit’ including agroecological methods. In the European context, agri-intensification has diverse forms and policy agendas. SI has been advocated to help keep farmers on the land by making their cultivation methods more market-competitive, while conserving biodiversity elsewhere; this approach complements a land-sparing strategy. By contrast, a different intensification agenda promotes biodiverse agroecosystems, complementing a land-sharing strategy. The New avenues for agronomy to strengthen agroecological intensification should go beyond the cultivated field or the mixture of species in a given landscape. They should explore desirable properties and mechanisms that operate at the scale of complex socio-ecological systems, i.e. that take into account sociological and ecological dynamics and interactions in agroecosystems (Doré et al., 2011: 203). new inputs less approach to animal welfare biodiversity