CAST AND BEYOND - IMPLICATIONS OF THE CARDIAC-ARRHYTHMIA SUPPRESSION TRIAL
CAST AND BEYOND - IMPLICATIONS OF THE CARDIAC-ARRHYTHMIA SUPPRESSION TRIAL
复制标题
DOI:
10.1161/01.cir.81.3.1123
复制
发表时间:
1990-03-01
期刊:
影响因子:
37.8
通讯作者:
ZIPES, DP
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
AKHTAR, M;BREITHARDT, G;ZIPES, DP
F requent and repetitive forms of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) have been rec-ognized as independent markers of increased risk for sudden cardiac death in patients with a previous myocardial infarction. On this basis, the Cardiac Arrhythmic Suppression Trial (CAST) was initiated to test the hypothesis that suppression of these ventricular arrhythmias would reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death. 1 As critically reviewed by Furberg, 2 previous studies with antiarrhythmic drugs in post-myocardial infarction patients were seriously flawed in one or more ways, such that they could not conclusively demon-strate whether suppression of ventricular arrhythmias by the antiarrhythmic drugs studied affected survival. CAST, a placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-center study, was initiated in June 1987 to evaluate the effect of three antiarrhythmic drugs (encainide, flecainide, and moricizine) in patients whohad sus-tained a myocardial infarction and had asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias. Approximately 22 months after its initiation, part of the study was prematurely halted, andthe remaining part was significantly modified because of excessive mortality in the group of patients randomized to treatment with encainide or flecainide. 1 The study is continuing with the third drug, moricizine. CAST is an important study for several reasons. For the first time, convincing data were provided regarding a mode of antiarrhythmic treatment that existed for some 20 years and was widely applied by practicing physicians. The results of CAST may lead to extensive changes in antiarrhythmic therapy, and they merit careful consideration. Also, results from CAST answered the hypotheses posed for flecainide