Design Computing and Cognition '16
Design Computing and Cognition '16
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-319-44989-0
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Gero
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Gero
本文介绍了一个实验，是一个更大的研究项目，比较组的设计师和非设计师之间的视觉推理的一部分。特别是，这个实验的重点是如何设计师的推理过程的特点时，他们被赋予不同程度的减少信息的对象相比，一组非设计师。该实验使用了Gerrit Riedveld标志性的红蓝椅子的解构和缩小组件。三组被给予3种不同水平的信息--第一组被给予与原始椅子相同颜色的组件，第二组被给予单一颜色（白色）的组件，第三组被给予未涂漆（自然）的组件。结果表明，3个层次的简化信息对设计者的视觉推理过程都有影响，设计者和非设计者的视觉推理过程存在明显差异。
This paper describes an experiment that is part of a larger research project that compares the visual reasoning between groups of designers and non-designers. In particular, this experiment focuses on how designers’ processes of reasoning is characterized when they are given different levels of reduced information of an object in comparison to a group of non-designers. The experiment used deconstructed and scaled-down components of Gerrit Riedveld’s iconic Red and Blue Chair. Three groups were given 3 different levels of information—group 1 were given components painted the same color as the original chair, group 2 were given components painted in a single (white) color, and group 3 were given unpainted (natural) components. The results suggest that the 3 levels of reduced information impacted on the designers’ reasoning processes and there were clear differences in the visual reasoning processes between design and non-design participants.