Kinect range sensing: Structured-light versus Time-of-Flight Kinect
Kinect range sensing: Structured-light versus Time-of-Flight Kinect
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.cviu.2015.05.006
复制
发表时间：
2015-10-01
影响因子：
4.5
通讯作者：
Kolb, Andreas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Sarbolandi, Hamed;Lefloch, Damien;Kolb, Andreas
最近，微软发布了新的Kinect One，提供了基于飞行时间（ToF）原理的下一代实时距离传感设备。由于第一个Kinect版本使用的是结构光方法，因此人们会期望两种设备传输的范围数据的特征有所不同。本文对这两种装置进行了详细而深入的比较。为了进行比较，我们提出了一个由七个不同实验设置组成的框架，这是评估Kinect等距离相机的通用基础。这些实验的目的是尽可能孤立地捕捉Kinect设备的单个效果，并且在某种程度上，它们也可以被采用，以便将它们应用于任何其他距离传感设备。本文的总体目标是为这两种设备的优缺点提供一个坚实的见解。因此，有兴趣在特定应用场景中使用Kinect测距相机的科学家可以直接评估任何一种设备的预期、具体好处和潜在问题。(C) 2015爱思唯尔公司版权所有。
Recently, the new Kinect One has been issued by Microsoft, providing the next generation of real-time range sensing devices based on the Time-of-Flight (ToF) principle. As the first Kinect version was using a structured light approach, one would expect various differences in the characteristics of the range data delivered by both devices.This paper presents a detailed and in-depth comparison between both devices. In order to conduct the comparison, we propose a framework of seven different experimental setups, which is a generic basis for evaluating range cameras such as Kinect. The experiments have been designed with the goal to capture individual effects of the Kinect devices as isolatedly as possible and in a way, that they can also be adopted, in order to apply them to any other range sensing device. The overall goal of this paper is to provide a solid insight into the pros and cons of either device. Thus, scientists who are interested in using Kinect range sensing cameras in their specific application scenario can directly assess the expected, specific benefits and potential problem of either device. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.