Comparison of Binding Platforms Yields Insights into Receptor Binding Differences between Shiga Toxins 1 and 2
Comparison of Binding Platforms Yields Insights into Receptor Binding Differences between Shiga Toxins 1 and 2
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/bi902084y
复制
发表时间:
2010-03-02
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Weiss, Alison A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Flagler, Michael J.;Mahajan, Sujit S.;Weiss, Alison A.
Protein-glycan interactions Dire typically very weak, and avid binding is achieved when proteins express multiple glycan binding sites. Shiga toxin (Stx) uses glycan receptors to enter cells. Stx has five identical binding subunits, each with three nonidentical glycan binding sites. Previous studies examined binding to biantennary glycans expressing Ilk trisaccharide mimics immobilized oil streptavidin, resulting in display of four trisaccharides per streptavidin face. Stx1 preferred the Ilk trisaccharide of its native receptor, globotriaosylceramide (Gb3), while the more potent and clinically relevant variant, Stx2, preferred the Ilk trisaccharide with the terminal galactose replaced with N-acetylgalactosamine (NHAc-Pk). In the present study, binding of Stxs to Ilk analogues was examined Using two experimental platforms, ELISA and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). ELISA was more sensitive than SPR. Sensitivity in the ELISA Was due to high streptavidin density, suggesting that avid binding may require engagement or more than four trisaccharides. Selectivity for the Pk analogues was maintained in both experimental platforms. Glycan preference was mapped to binding site 2, since reciprocal mutation of a single amino acid (asparagine 32 of Stx1 B-subunit/serine 31 of Stx2 B-subunit) reversed binding preference, However, native Stx1 bound well to plates loaded with a 50:50 mixture of Pk-NHAc-Pk, while Stx2 bound less efficiently, suggesting that one of the Stx1 binding sites may only engage Pk, while another may tolerate either Pk or NHAc-Pk. Varying glycan structure and density across different in vitro binding platforms revealed important differences in receptor binding properties between Stx1 and Stx2.