Resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: An RTOG recursive partitioning analysis of ALA study patients

Resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: An RTOG recursive partitioning analysis of ALA study patients
复制标题

DOI:
10.1215/15228517-2008-052
复制
发表时间:
2008-12-01
期刊:
影响因子:
15.9
通讯作者:
Stummer, Walter
Stummer, Walter
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pichlmeier, Uwe;Bink, Andrea;Stummer, Walter

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

细胞减灭术对多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)的益处尚不清楚,并且在过去的系列中观察到了选择偏差。 5-氨基乙酰丙酸 (ALA) 研究调查了荧光引导切除术对结果的影响,并生成了经过优化切除的 GBM 患者的广泛数据库。我们评估了放射治疗肿瘤学组递归分区分析 (RTOG-RPA) 是否可以预测这些患者的生存率,以及根据 RPA 类别,广泛切除是否有任何益处。共有 243 名符合方案的新诊断 GBM 患者接受了联合或不联合 ALA 的手术并接受放射治疗。所有患者均获得术后 MRI。根据年龄、KPS、神经系统状况和精神状态(源自 NIH 卒中量表),将患者分为 RTOG-RPA III-V 级。 RPA III、IV 和 V 级的中位总生存期分别为 17.8、14.7 和 10.7 个月,2 年生存率为 26%、12% 和 7% (p = 0.0007)。按切除程度分层,完全切除的 RPA IV 级和 V 级患者的生存期明显更长(17.7 个月 vs. 12.9 个月,p = 0.0015,13.7 个月 vs. 10.4 个月,p = 0.0398;2 年率:分别为 21.0% vs. 4.4% 和 11.1% vs. 2.6%),但不在 RPA III 级患者的小亚组中(19.3 个月与 16.3 个月,p = 0.14)。 RTOG-RPA 类别正确预测了 ALA 研究中患者的生存率。生存率的差异取决于切除状态,特别是在 RPA IV 级和 V 级中,支持切除对生存率的因果影响。 Neuro-Oncology 10, 1025-1034, 2008(发表于 Neuro-Oncology [在线连载],Doc. D08-00007,2008 年 7 月 30 日。URL http://neuro-oncology.dukejournals.org;DOI:10.1215/15228517-2008-052)
The benefit of cytoreductive surgery for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is unclear, and selection bias in past series has been observed. The 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) study investigated the influence of fluorescence-guided resections on outcome and generated an extensive database of GBM patients with optimized resections. We evaluated whether the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RTOG-RPA) would predict survival of these patients and whether there was any benefit from extensive resections depending on RPA class. A total of 243 per-protocol patients with newly diagnosed GBM were operated on with or without ALA and treated by radiotherapy. Postoperative MRI was obtained in all patients. Patients were allocated into RTOG-RPA classes III-V based on age, KPS, neurological condition, and mental status (as derived from the NIH Stroke Scale). Median overall survival among RPA classes III, IV, and V was 17.8, 14.7, and 10.7 months, respectively, with 2-year survival rates of 26%, 12%, and 7% (p = 0.0007). Stratified for degree of resection, survival of patients with complete resections was clearly longer in RPA classes IV and V (17.7 months vs. 12.9 months, p = 0.0015, and 13.7 months vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.0398; 2-year rates: 21.0% vs. 4.4% and 11.1% vs. 2.6%, respectively), but was not in the small subgroup of RPA class III patients (19.3 vs. 16.3 months, p = 0.14). Survival of patients from the ALA study is correctly predicted by the RTOG-RPA classes. Differences in survival depending on resection status, especially in RPA classes IV and V, support a causal influence of resection on survival. Neuro-Oncology 10, 1025-1034, 2008 (Posted to Neuro-Oncology [serial online], Doc. D08-00007, July 30, 2008. URL http://neuro-oncology.dukejournals.org; DOI: 10.1215/15228517-2008-052)