Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: Does an extra space make a difference?

Parafoveal-on-foveal effects on eye movements in text reading: Does an extra space make a difference?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.010
复制
发表时间:
2005-06-01
期刊:
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
Desmet, T
Desmet, T
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Drieghe, D;Brysbaert, M;Desmet, T

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

Schipers [Schipers(1980).视觉文字再认的反应潜伏期与正确率。Perception S Psychophysics,27,71-81]提出,在文本阅读中,当前注视的单词和下一个单词是并行处理的,但每偏心度有90英寸的时间延迟。在他的模型中,看到即将到来的单词的好处是由于来自注视n的旁视信息与来自注视n + 1的中央凹信息相结合以提高单词识别,至少当对单词n的注视具有最佳持续时间(在210和270 ms之间)时。我们通过在中央凹和旁凹单词之间添加额外的空格来测试这个假设。根据该模型,这将导致中央凹单词的处理时间延长30 ms。然而,阅读时间短的一个字后,一个双空格比一个字后,一个单一的空间。也观察到旁视字长度的影响,在旁视中较长的字导致中央凹字的固定时间较短。这些低水平的parafterial-on-foveal效应的影响进行了讨论。(c)2005爱思唯尔有限公司保留所有权利。
Schiepers [Schiepers (1980). Response latency and accuracy in visual word recognition. Perception S Psychophysics, 27, 71-81] proposed that in text reading, the currently fixated word and the next word are processed in parallel but with a time delay of 90 ins per degree of eccentricity. In his model, the benefit of seeing the upcoming word is due to the fact that the parafoveal information from fixation n is combined with the foveal information from fixation n + 1 to boost word recognition, at least when the fixation on word n is of an optimal duration (between 210 and 270 ms). We tested this assumption by adding an extra blank space between the foveal and the parafoveal word. According to the model, this should result in a 30 ms longer processing time for the foveal word. However, reading time was shorter for a word followed by a double space than for a word followed by a single space. An effect of parafoveal word length was also observed with a longer word in the parafovea leading to shorter fixation times on the foveal word. Implications of these low-level parafoveal-on-foveal effects are discussed. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.