The representation of sublexical orthographic-phonologic correspondences: evidence from phonological dyslexia.
The representation of sublexical orthographic-phonologic correspondences: evidence from phonological dyslexia.
复制标题
词汇下的拼写-语音对应的表示：来自语音阅读障碍的证据。
DOI：
10.1080/713755790
复制
发表时间：
1998
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Martin,RC
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lesch,MF;Martin,RC
虽然有相当多的证据表明，字形和身体单位参与组装从印刷品的音韵，有很少的证据支持音节表示的参与。我们提供的证据在这一点上，从语音障碍患者（ML）谁，由于脑损伤，是相对无法阅读非文字。ML被认为能够执行任务，以反映过程中所涉及的组装音韵（即分割，正字法-音位转换，和混合）时，所涉及的单位是音节，但表现出相当大的困难时，他们的发作，身体，或音素单位。此外，ML和匹配的对照组都能更好地找到单词在一个字谜任务（Treiman & Chafetz，1987）时，他们产生的组合段对应于音节比当他们没有。有人认为，印刷品和声音之间的关系是在多个层次（包括音节）（Shallice，Warrington，和麦卡锡，1983年）和ML的非字阅读障碍是破坏的结果表示低于音节的水平。
Although there is considerable evidence that grapheme and body units are involved in assembling phonology from print, there is little evidence supporting the involvement of syllabic representations. We provide evidence on this point from a phonological dyslexic patient (ML) who, as a result of brain damage, is relatively unable to read nonwords. ML was found to be able to perform tasks assumed to reflect processes involved in assembled phonology (i.e. segmentation, orthographic-phonologic conversion, and blending) when the units involved were syllables, but demonstrated considerable difficulty when they were onset, body, or phoneme units. Additionally, both ML and matched controls were much better able to find words in an anagrams task (Treiman & Chafetz, 1987) when they resulted from the combination of segments corresponding to syllables than when they did not. It is suggested that the relationship between print and sound is represented at multiple levels (including the syllable) (Shallice, Warrington, & McCarthy, 1983) and that ML's nonword reading impairment is the result of disruption of representations below the level of the syllable.